rather than the constructors of passes.
This simplifies the APIs of passes significantly and removes an error
prone pattern where the *same* manager had to be given to every
different layer. With the new API the analysis managers themselves will
have to be cross connected with proxy analyses that allow a pass at one
layer to query for the analysis manager of another layer. The proxy will
both expose a handle to the other layer's manager and it will provide
the invalidation hooks to ensure things remain consistent across layers.
Finally, the outer-most analysis manager has to be passed to the run
method of the outer-most pass manager. The rest of the propagation is
automatic.
I've used SFINAE again to allow passes to completely disregard the
analysis manager if they don't need or want to care. This helps keep
simple things simple for users of the new pass manager.
Also, the system specifically supports passing a null pointer into the
outer-most run method if your pass pipeline neither needs nor wants to
deal with analyses. I find this of dubious utility as while some
*passes* don't care about analysis, I'm not sure there are any
real-world users of the pass manager itself that need to avoid even
creating an analysis manager. But it is easy to support, so there we go.
Finally I renamed the module proxy for the function analysis manager to
the more verbose but less confusing name of
FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy. I hate this name, but I have no idea
what else to name these things. I'm expecting in the fullness of time to
potentially have the complete cross product of types at the proxy layer:
{Module,SCC,Function,Loop,Region}AnalysisManager{Module,SCC,Function,Loop,Region}Proxy
(except for XAnalysisManagerXProxy which doesn't make any sense)
This should make it somewhat easier to do the next phases which is to
build the upward proxy and get its invalidation correct, as well as to
make the invalidation within the Module -> Function mapping pass be more
fine grained so as to invalidate fewer fuction analyses.
After all of the proxy analyses are done and the invalidation working,
I'll finally be able to start working on the next two fun fronts: how to
adapt an existing pass to work in both the legacy pass world and the new
one, and building the SCC, Loop, and Region counterparts. Fun times!
llvm-svn: 195400
This patch is a rewrite of the original patch commited in r194542. Instead of
relying on the type legalizer to do the splitting for us, we now peform the
splitting ourselves in the DAG combiner. This is necessary for the case where
the vector mask is a legal type after promotion and still wouldn't require
splitting.
Patch by: Juergen Ributzka
NOTE: This is a candidate for the 3.4 branch.
llvm-svn: 195397
It broke, at least, i686 target. It is reproducible with "llc -mtriple=i686-unknown".
FYI, it didn't appear to add either "-O0" or "-fast-isel".
llvm-svn: 195339
it is completely optional, and sink the logic for handling the preserved
analysis set into it.
This allows us to implement the delegation logic desired in the proxy
module analysis for the function analysis manager where if the proxy
itself is preserved we assume the set of functions hasn't changed and we
do a fine grained invalidation by walking the functions in the module
and running the invalidate for them all at the manager level and letting
it try to invalidate any passes.
This in turn makes it blindingly obvious why we should hoist the
invalidate trait and have two collections of results. That allows
handling invalidation for almost all analyses without indirect calls and
it allows short circuiting when the preserved set is all.
llvm-svn: 195338
type and detect whether or not it provides an 'invalidate' member the
analysis manager should use.
This lets the overwhelming common case of *not* caring about custom
behavior when an analysis is invalidated be the the obvious default
behavior with no code written by the author of an analysis. Only when
they write code specifically to handle invalidation does it get used.
Both cases are actually covered by tests here. The test analysis uses
the default behavior, and the proxy module analysis actually has custom
behavior on invalidation that is firing correctly. (In fact, this is the
analysis which was the primary motivation for having custom invalidation
behavior in the first place.)
llvm-svn: 195332
This proxy will fill the role of proxying invalidation events down IR
unit layers so that when a module changes we correctly invalidate
function analyses. Currently this is a very coarse solution -- any
change blows away the entire thing -- but the next step is to make
invalidation handling more nuanced so that we can propagate specific
amounts of invalidation from one layer to the next.
The test is extended to place a module pass between two function pass
managers each of which have preserved function analyses which get
correctly invalidated by the module pass that might have changed what
functions are even in the module.
llvm-svn: 195304
MappingTrait template specializations can now have a validate() method which
performs semantic checking. For details, see <http://llvm.org/docs/YamlIO.html>.
llvm-svn: 195286
Enhance the tests to actually require moves in C++11 mode, in addition
to testing the moved-from state. Further enhance the tests to cover
copy-assignment into a moved-from object and moving a large-state
object. (Note that we can't really test small-state vs. large-state as
that isn't an observable property of the API really.) This should finish
addressing review on r195239.
llvm-svn: 195261
This adds a new set-like type which represents a set of preserved
analysis passes. The set is managed via the opaque PassT::ID() void*s.
The expected convenience templates for interacting with specific passes
are provided. It also supports a symbolic "all" state which is
represented by an invalid pointer in the set. This state is nicely
saturating as it comes up often. Finally, it supports intersection which
is used when finding the set of preserved passes after N different
transforms.
The pass API is then changed to return the preserved set rather than
a bool. This is much more self-documenting than the previous system.
Returning "none" is a conservatively correct solution just like
returning "true" from todays passes and not marking any passes as
preserved. Passes can also be dynamically preserved or not throughout
the run of the pass, and whatever gets returned is the binding state.
Finally, preserving "all" the passes is allowed for no-op transforms
that simply can't harm such things.
Finally, the analysis managers are changed to instead of blindly
invalidating all of the analyses, invalidate those which were not
preserved. This should rig up all of the basic preservation
functionality. This also correctly combines the preservation moving up
from one IR-layer to the another and the preservation aggregation across
N pass runs. Still to go is incrementally correct invalidation and
preservation across IR layers incrementally during N pass runs. That
will wait until we have a device for even exposing analyses across IR
layers.
While the core of this change is obvious, I'm not happy with the current
testing, so will improve it to cover at least some of the invalidation
that I can test easily in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 195241
Somehow, this ADT got missed which is moderately terrifying considering
the efficiency of move for it.
The code to implement move semantics for it is pretty horrible
currently but was written to reasonably closely match the rest of the
code. Unittests that cover both copying and moving (at a basic level)
added.
llvm-svn: 195239
The FunctionPassManager is now itself a function pass. When run over
a function, it runs all N of its passes over that function. This is the
1:N mapping in the pass dimension only. This allows it to be used in
either a ModulePassManager or potentially some other manager that
works on IR units which are supersets of Functions.
This commit also adds the obvious adaptor to map from a module pass to
a function pass, running the function pass across every function in the
module.
The test has been updated to use this new pattern.
llvm-svn: 195192
Instead of permanently outputting "MVLL" as the file checksum, clang
will create gcno and gcda checksums by hashing the destination block
numbers of every arc. This allows for llvm-cov to check if the two gcov
files are synchronized.
Regenerated the test files so they contain the checksum. Also added
negative test to ensure error when the checksums don't match.
llvm-svn: 195191
a module-specific interface. This is the first of many steps necessary
to generalize the infrastructure such that we can support both
a Module-to-Function and Module-to-SCC-to-Function pass manager
nestings.
After a *lot* of attempts that never worked and didn't even make it to
a committable state, it became clear that I had gotten the layering
design of analyses flat out wrong. Four days later, I think I have most
of the plan for how to correct this, and I'm starting to reshape the
code into it. This is just a baby step I'm afraid, but starts separating
the fundamentally distinct concepts of function analysis passes and
module analysis passes so that in subsequent steps we can effectively
layer them, and have a consistent design for the eventual SCC layer.
As part of this, I've started some interface changes to make passes more
regular. The module pass accepts the module in the run method, and some
of the constructor parameters are gone. I'm still working out exactly
where constructor parameters vs. method parameters will be used, so
I expect this to fluctuate a bit.
This actually makes the invalidation less "correct" at this phase,
because now function passes don't invalidate module analysis passes, but
that was actually somewhat of a misfeature. It will return in a better
factored form which can scale to other units of IR. The documentation
has gotten less verbose and helpful.
llvm-svn: 195189
This is the first step to fix pr17918.
It extends the .section directive a bit, inspired by what the ELF one looks
like. The problem with using linkonce is that given
.section foo
.linkonce....
.section foo
.linkonce
we would already have switched sections when getting to .linkonce. The cleanest
solution seems to be to add the comdat information in the .section itself.
llvm-svn: 195148
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
We used to depend on running processModule before the other public functions
such as processDeclare, processValue and processLocation. We are now relaxing
the constraint by adding a module argument to the three functions and
letting the three functions to initialize the type map. This will be used in
a follow-on patch that collects nodes reachable from a Function.
llvm-svn: 194973
This adds a boolean member variable to the PassManagerBuilder to control loop
rerolling (just like we have for unrolling and the various vectorization
options). This is necessary for control by the frontend. Loop rerolling remains
disabled by default at all optimization levels.
llvm-svn: 194966
This change is the first in a series of changes improving LLVM's Block
Frequency propogation implementation to not lose probability mass in
branchy code when propogating block frequency information from a basic
block to its successors. This patch is a simple infrastructure
improvement that does not actually modify the block frequency
algorithm. The specific changes are:
1. Changes the division algorithm used when scaling block frequencies by
branch probabilities to a short division algorithm. This gives us the
remainder for free as well as provides a nice speed boost. When I
benched the old routine and the new routine on a Sandy Bridge iMac with
disabled turbo mode performing 8192 iterations on an array of length
32768, I saw ~600% increase in speed in mean/median performance.
2. Exposes a scale method that returns a remainder. This is important so
we can ensure that when we scale a block frequency by some branch
probability BP = N/D, the remainder from the division by D can be
retrieved and propagated to other children to ensure no probability mass
is lost (more to come on this).
llvm-svn: 194950
AnalysisManager. All this method did was assert something and we have
a perfectly good way to trigger that assert from the query path.
llvm-svn: 194947
Implementing this on bigendian platforms could get strange. I added a
target hook, getStackSlotRange, per Jakob's recommendation to make
this as explicit as possible.
llvm-svn: 194942
This adds a loop rerolling pass: the opposite of (partial) loop unrolling. The
transformation aims to take loops like this:
for (int i = 0; i < 3200; i += 5) {
a[i] += alpha * b[i];
a[i + 1] += alpha * b[i + 1];
a[i + 2] += alpha * b[i + 2];
a[i + 3] += alpha * b[i + 3];
a[i + 4] += alpha * b[i + 4];
}
and turn them into this:
for (int i = 0; i < 3200; ++i) {
a[i] += alpha * b[i];
}
and loops like this:
for (int i = 0; i < 500; ++i) {
x[3*i] = foo(0);
x[3*i+1] = foo(0);
x[3*i+2] = foo(0);
}
and turn them into this:
for (int i = 0; i < 1500; ++i) {
x[i] = foo(0);
}
There are two motivations for this transformation:
1. Code-size reduction (especially relevant, obviously, when compiling for
code size).
2. Providing greater choice to the loop vectorizer (and generic unroller) to
choose the unrolling factor (and a better ability to vectorize). The loop
vectorizer can take vector lengths and register pressure into account when
choosing an unrolling factor, for example, and a pre-unrolled loop limits that
choice. This is especially problematic if the manual unrolling was optimized
for a machine different from the current target.
The current implementation is limited to single basic-block loops only. The
rerolling recognition should work regardless of how the loop iterations are
intermixed within the loop body (subject to dependency and side-effect
constraints), but the significant restriction is that the order of the
instructions in each iteration must be identical. This seems sufficient to
capture all current use cases.
This pass is not currently enabled by default at any optimization level.
llvm-svn: 194939
