Adding RUN lines.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@17533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2024-11-25 04:39:51 +00:00 · 2004-11-06 23:08:26 +00:00 · 2004-11-06 23:08:26 +00:00 · 2393a24fed
commit 2393a24fed
parent e9af5d186b
53 changed files with 106 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; This causes the backend to assert out with:
 ; SparcInstrInfo.cpp:103: failed assertion `0 && "Unexpected unsigned type"'
 ;
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; Compiling this file produces:
 ; Sparc.cpp:91: failed assertion `(offset - OFFSET) % getStackFrameSizeAlignment() == 0'
 ;
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-27-phifcmpd.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-27-phifcmpd.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date: May 28, 2003.
 ;; From: test/Programs/MultiSource/McCat-05-eks/QRfact.c
 ;; Function: Matrix QRiterate(Matrix A, Matrix U)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 27, 2003.
 ;; From:     Variant of 2003-05-27-usefsubasbool.ll
 ;; 
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-27-usefsubasbool.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-27-usefsubasbool.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date: May 27, 2003.
 ;; From: test/Programs/MultiSource/McCat-05-eks/QRfact.c
 ;; Function: Matrix QRiterate(Matrix A, Matrix U)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-28-ManyArgs.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-28-ManyArgs.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 28, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT2000/175.vpr.llvm.bc
 ;; Function: int %main(int %argc.1, sbyte** %argv.1)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 28, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT2000/254.gap.llvm.bc
 ;; Function: int %OpenOutput(sbyte* %filename.1)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 28, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/SingleSource/richards_benchmark.c
 ;; Function: struct task *handlerfn(struct packet *pkt)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-06-BadIntCmp.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-06-BadIntCmp.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date: May 28, 2003.
 ;; From: test/Programs/MultiSource/Olden-perimeter/maketree.c
 ;; Function: int CheckOutside(int x, int y)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-07-BadLongConst.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-07-BadLongConst.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 target endian = big
 target pointersize = 64

--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-08-BadCastToBool.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-08-BadCastToBool.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     Jul 8, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/MultiSource/Olden-perimeter
 ;; Function: int %adj(uint %d.1, uint %ct.1)
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     Jul 29, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/MultiSource/Ptrdist-bc
 ;; Function: ---
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/BurgBadRegAlloc.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/BurgBadRegAlloc.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Register allocation is doing a very poor job on this routine from yyparse
 ;; in Burg:
 ;; -- at least two long-lived values are being allocated to %o? registers
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/badCallArgLRLLVM.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/badCallArgLRLLVM.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; This caused a problem because the argument of a call was defined by
 ; the return value of another call that appears later in the code.
 ; When processing the first call, the second call has not yet been processed
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/badFoldGEP.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/badFoldGEP.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; GetMemInstArgs() folded the two getElementPtr instructions together,
 ;; producing an illegal getElementPtr.  That's because the type generated
 ;; by the last index for the first one is a structure field, not an array
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/badarg6.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/badarg6.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; On this code, llc did not pass the sixth argument (%reg321) to printf.
 ; It passed the first five in %o0 - %o4, but never initialized %o5.
 ; Fix in  SparcInstrSelection.cpp: 
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/badlive.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/badlive.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 implementation

 int "main"()
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/constindices.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/constindices.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; Test that a sequence of constant indices are folded correctly
 ; into the equivalent offset at compile-time.

--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/fwdtwice.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/fwdtwice.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;;
 ;; Test the sequence:
 ;;	cast -> setle 0, %cast -> br %cond
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/negintconst.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/negintconst.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; Test that a negative constant smaller than 64 bits (e.g., int)
 ; is correctly implemented with sign-extension.
 ; In particular, the current code generated is:
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/sched.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/sched.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 implementation
 declare int "printf"(sbyte*, int, float)

--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/select.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/select.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 %AConst    = constant int 123

 %Domain = type { sbyte*, int, int*, int, int, int*, %Domain* }
--- a/test/CodeGen/Generic/spillccr.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/Generic/spillccr.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; July 6, 2002 -- LLC Regression test
 ; This test case checks if the integer CC register %xcc (or %ccr)
 ; is correctly spilled.  The code fragment came from function
--- a/test/LLC/2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; This causes the backend to assert out with:
 ; SparcInstrInfo.cpp:103: failed assertion `0 && "Unexpected unsigned type"'
 ;
--- a/test/LLC/2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; Compiling this file produces:
 ; Sparc.cpp:91: failed assertion `(offset - OFFSET) % getStackFrameSizeAlignment() == 0'
 ;
--- a/test/LLC/2003-05-27-phifcmpd.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-05-27-phifcmpd.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date: May 28, 2003.
 ;; From: test/Programs/MultiSource/McCat-05-eks/QRfact.c
 ;; Function: Matrix QRiterate(Matrix A, Matrix U)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 27, 2003.
 ;; From:     Variant of 2003-05-27-usefsubasbool.ll
 ;; 
--- a/test/LLC/2003-05-27-usefsubasbool.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-05-27-usefsubasbool.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date: May 27, 2003.
 ;; From: test/Programs/MultiSource/McCat-05-eks/QRfact.c
 ;; Function: Matrix QRiterate(Matrix A, Matrix U)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-05-28-ManyArgs.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-05-28-ManyArgs.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 28, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT2000/175.vpr.llvm.bc
 ;; Function: int %main(int %argc.1, sbyte** %argv.1)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 28, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT2000/254.gap.llvm.bc
 ;; Function: int %OpenOutput(sbyte* %filename.1)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     May 28, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/SingleSource/richards_benchmark.c
 ;; Function: struct task *handlerfn(struct packet *pkt)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-07-06-BadIntCmp.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-07-06-BadIntCmp.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date: May 28, 2003.
 ;; From: test/Programs/MultiSource/Olden-perimeter/maketree.c
 ;; Function: int CheckOutside(int x, int y)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-07-07-BadLongConst.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-07-07-BadLongConst.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 target endian = big
 target pointersize = 64

--- a/test/LLC/2003-07-08-BadCastToBool.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-07-08-BadCastToBool.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     Jul 8, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/MultiSource/Olden-perimeter
 ;; Function: int %adj(uint %d.1, uint %ct.1)
--- a/test/LLC/2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Date:     Jul 29, 2003.
 ;; From:     test/Programs/MultiSource/Ptrdist-bc
 ;; Function: ---
--- a/test/LLC/BurgBadRegAlloc.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/BurgBadRegAlloc.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; Register allocation is doing a very poor job on this routine from yyparse
 ;; in Burg:
 ;; -- at least two long-lived values are being allocated to %o? registers
--- a/test/LLC/badCallArgLRLLVM.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/badCallArgLRLLVM.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; This caused a problem because the argument of a call was defined by
 ; the return value of another call that appears later in the code.
 ; When processing the first call, the second call has not yet been processed
--- a/test/LLC/badFoldGEP.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/badFoldGEP.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;; GetMemInstArgs() folded the two getElementPtr instructions together,
 ;; producing an illegal getElementPtr.  That's because the type generated
 ;; by the last index for the first one is a structure field, not an array
--- a/test/LLC/badarg6.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/badarg6.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; On this code, llc did not pass the sixth argument (%reg321) to printf.
 ; It passed the first five in %o0 - %o4, but never initialized %o5.
 ; Fix in  SparcInstrSelection.cpp: 
--- a/test/LLC/badlive.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/badlive.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 implementation

 int "main"()
--- a/test/LLC/constindices.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/constindices.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; Test that a sequence of constant indices are folded correctly
 ; into the equivalent offset at compile-time.

--- a/test/LLC/fwdtwice.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/fwdtwice.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ;;
 ;; Test the sequence:
 ;;	cast -> setle 0, %cast -> br %cond
--- a/test/LLC/negintconst.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/negintconst.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; Test that a negative constant smaller than 64 bits (e.g., int)
 ; is correctly implemented with sign-extension.
 ; In particular, the current code generated is:
--- a/test/LLC/sched.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/sched.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 implementation
 declare int "printf"(sbyte*, int, float)

--- a/test/LLC/select.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/select.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 %AConst    = constant int 123

 %Domain = type { sbyte*, int, int*, int, int, int*, %Domain* }
--- a/test/LLC/spillccr.ll
+++ b/test/LLC/spillccr.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as -f %s -o - | llc
+
 ; July 6, 2002 -- LLC Regression test
 ; This test case checks if the integer CC register %xcc (or %ccr)
 ; is correctly spilled.  The code fragment came from function
--- a/test/Verifier/2002-04-13-RetTypes.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/2002-04-13-RetTypes.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+
 ; Verify the the operand type of the ret instructions in a function match the
 ; delcared return type of the function they live in.
 ;
--- a/test/Verifier/2002-11-05-GetelementptrPointers.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/2002-11-05-GetelementptrPointers.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+
 ; This testcase is invalid because we are indexing into a pointer that is 
 ; contained WITHIN a structure.

--- a/test/Verifier/2003-11-21-FunctionReturningStructure.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/2003-11-21-FunctionReturningStructure.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+

 %T = type { int }

--- a/test/Verifier/2004-05-21-SwitchConstantMismatch.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/2004-05-21-SwitchConstantMismatch.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+


 int %main() {  
--- a/test/Verifier/AmbiguousPhi.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/AmbiguousPhi.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+


 int "test"(int %i, int %j, bool %c) {
--- a/test/Verifier/PhiGrouping.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/PhiGrouping.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+


 int "test"(int %i, int %j, bool %c) {
--- a/test/Verifier/SelfReferential.ll
+++ b/test/Verifier/SelfReferential.ll
@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: not llvm-as -f %s -o /dev/null
+
 ; Test that self referential instructions are not allowed

 implementation