mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2026-07-21 03:05:26 -04:00
[DebugInfo] Examine all uses of isDebugValue() for debug instructions.
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function, isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is debug instruction or not. This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is no difference in regression test. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342 Patch by Hsiangkai Wang. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@331844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ bool ExecutionDomainFix::visitInstr(MachineInstr *MI) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ExecutionDomainFix::processDefs(MachineInstr *MI, bool Kill) {
|
||||
assert(!MI->isDebugValue() && "Won't process debug values");
|
||||
assert(!MI->isDebugInstr() && "Won't process debug values");
|
||||
const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI->getDesc();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0,
|
||||
e = MI->isVariadic() ? MI->getNumOperands() : MCID.getNumDefs();
|
||||
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ void ExecutionDomainFix::processBasicBlock(
|
||||
// and by then we'll have better information, so we can avoid doing the work
|
||||
// to try and break dependencies now.
|
||||
for (MachineInstr &MI : *TraversedMBB.MBB) {
|
||||
if (!MI.isDebugValue()) {
|
||||
if (!MI.isDebugInstr()) {
|
||||
bool Kill = false;
|
||||
if (TraversedMBB.PrimaryPass)
|
||||
Kill = visitInstr(&MI);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user