[RewriteStatepointsForGC] Strengthen a confusingly weak assertion [NFC]

The assertion was weaker than it should be and gave the impression we're growing the number of base defining values being considered during the fixed point interation.  That's not true.  The tighter form of the assert is useful documentation.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@247221 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Philip Reames 2015-09-10 00:32:56 +00:00
parent dc9cbaf22e
commit 3f0fe63960

View File

@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static Value *findBasePointer(Value *I, DefiningValueMapTy &cache) {
bool progress = true;
while (progress) {
#ifndef NDEBUG
size_t oldSize = States.size();
const size_t oldSize = States.size();
#endif
progress = false;
// We're only changing values in this loop, thus safe to keep iterators.
@ -842,8 +842,8 @@ static Value *findBasePointer(Value *I, DefiningValueMapTy &cache) {
}
}
assert(oldSize <= States.size());
assert(oldSize == States.size() || progress);
assert(oldSize == States.size() &&
"fixed point shouldn't be adding any new nodes to state");
}
#ifndef NDEBUG