From 4a5dfeeeaafe3acd086c841527c530cdfc146403 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:26:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix validation problem

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@29745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 docs/GetElementPtr.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/GetElementPtr.html b/docs/GetElementPtr.html
index 13df3f46f2b..dacc341bf1c 100644
--- a/docs/GetElementPtr.html
+++ b/docs/GetElementPtr.html
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@
   <pre>
   X = &amp;Foo[0].F;</pre>
   <p>Sometimes this question gets rephrased as:</p>
-  <blockquote><i>Why is it okay to index through the first pointer, but 
-      subsequent pointers won't be dereferenced?</i></blockquote> 
+  <blockquote><p><i>Why is it okay to index through the first pointer, but 
+      subsequent pointers won't be dereferenced?</i></p></blockquote> 
   <p>The answer is simply because memory does not have to be accessed to 
   perform the computation. The first operand to the GEP instruction must be a 
   value of a pointer type. The value of the pointer is provided directly to