mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2025-02-21 03:00:45 +00:00
[PeepholeOpt] Don't stop simplifying copies on sequence of subregs
This patch removes an overly conservative check that would prevent simplifying copies when the value we were tracking would go through several subregister indices. Indeed, the intend of this check was to not track values whenever we have to compose subregister, but actually what the check was doing was bailing anytime we see a second subreg, even if that second subreg would actually be the new source of truth (as opposed to a part of that subreg). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59891 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357095 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0d95f2d77
commit
5a4d441633
@ -1900,13 +1900,8 @@ ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromRegSequence() {
|
||||
// Def = REG_SEQUENCE v0, sub0, v1, sub1, ...
|
||||
// Check if one of the operand defines the subreg we are interested in.
|
||||
for (const RegSubRegPairAndIdx &RegSeqInput : RegSeqInputRegs) {
|
||||
if (RegSeqInput.SubIdx == DefSubReg) {
|
||||
if (RegSeqInput.SubReg)
|
||||
// Bail if we have to compose sub registers.
|
||||
return ValueTrackerResult();
|
||||
|
||||
if (RegSeqInput.SubIdx == DefSubReg)
|
||||
return ValueTrackerResult(RegSeqInput.Reg, RegSeqInput.SubReg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the subreg we are tracking is super-defined by another subreg,
|
||||
|
34
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/peephole-opt-regseq-removal.mir
Normal file
34
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/peephole-opt-regseq-removal.mir
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py
|
||||
# RUN: llc -march=amdgcn -run-pass peephole-opt -verify-machineinstrs -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GCN %s
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that when we jump through several subregisters in sequence of
|
||||
# reg_sequence we can still find a plain src for a copy.
|
||||
# In this specific test, we want %4 to read directly from %1 and
|
||||
# %5 from %0. These values come from the respective chains:
|
||||
# %4 -> %3.sub0 -> %2.sub1 -> %1
|
||||
# %5 -> %3.sub1 -> %2.sub0 -> %0
|
||||
#
|
||||
# We used to not simplify this because we were bailing when two
|
||||
# subreg indices were in the same chain (%3.subX and %2.subY)
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: reg_sequence_removal
|
||||
body: |
|
||||
bb.0:
|
||||
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
|
||||
|
||||
; GCN-LABEL: name: reg_sequence_removal
|
||||
; GCN: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr0
|
||||
; GCN: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr1
|
||||
; GCN: [[REG_SEQUENCE:%[0-9]+]]:vreg_64 = REG_SEQUENCE [[COPY]], %subreg.sub0, [[COPY1]], %subreg.sub1
|
||||
; GCN: [[REG_SEQUENCE1:%[0-9]+]]:vreg_64 = REG_SEQUENCE [[REG_SEQUENCE]].sub1, %subreg.sub0, [[REG_SEQUENCE]].sub0, %subreg.sub1
|
||||
; GCN: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr_32 = COPY [[COPY1]]
|
||||
; GCN: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr_32 = COPY [[COPY]]
|
||||
; GCN: KILL [[COPY3]], implicit [[COPY2]]
|
||||
%0:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr0
|
||||
%1:vgpr_32 = COPY $vgpr1
|
||||
%2:vreg_64 = REG_SEQUENCE %0, %subreg.sub0, %1, %subreg.sub1
|
||||
%3:vreg_64 = REG_SEQUENCE %2.sub1, %subreg.sub0, %2.sub0, %subreg.sub1
|
||||
%4:vgpr_32 = COPY %3.sub0
|
||||
%5:vgpr_32 = COPY %3.sub1
|
||||
KILL implicit %4, %5
|
||||
...
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user