mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2024-12-28 23:43:50 +00:00
[PeepholeOptimizer] Take advantage of the isExtractSubreg property in the
advanced copy optimization. This patch is a step toward transforming: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 bx lr Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through vmov r0, r1, d16 but it does not understand yet vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 Comming patches will fix that and update the related test case. <rdar://problem/12702965> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216136 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee1b45f2a2
commit
8ccce6b8fe
@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ namespace {
|
||||
/// not recognized by the register coalescer.
|
||||
bool isUncoalescableCopy(const MachineInstr &MI) {
|
||||
return MI.isBitcast() || (!DisableAdvCopyOpt &&
|
||||
MI.isRegSequenceLike());
|
||||
(MI.isRegSequenceLike() ||
|
||||
MI.isExtractSubregLike()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1346,28 +1347,10 @@ bool ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromInsertSubreg(unsigned &SrcReg,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Extract the inputs from EXTRACT_SUBREG.
|
||||
/// EXTRACT_SUBREG vreg1:sub1, sub0, would produce:
|
||||
/// - vreg1:sub1, sub0
|
||||
static void
|
||||
getExtractSubregInputs(const MachineInstr &MI,
|
||||
TargetInstrInfo::RegSubRegPairAndIdx &InputReg) {
|
||||
assert(MI.isExtractSubreg() && "Instruction do not have the proper type");
|
||||
// We are looking at:
|
||||
// Def = EXTRACT_SUBREG v0.sub1, sub0.
|
||||
const MachineOperand &MOReg = MI.getOperand(1);
|
||||
const MachineOperand &MOSubIdx = MI.getOperand(2);
|
||||
assert(MOSubIdx.isImm() &&
|
||||
"The subindex of the extract_subreg is not an immediate");
|
||||
|
||||
InputReg.Reg = MOReg.getReg();
|
||||
InputReg.SubReg = MOReg.getSubReg();
|
||||
InputReg.SubIdx = (unsigned)MOSubIdx.getImm();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromExtractSubreg(unsigned &SrcReg,
|
||||
unsigned &SrcSubReg) {
|
||||
assert(Def->isExtractSubreg() && "Invalid definition");
|
||||
assert((Def->isExtractSubreg() ||
|
||||
Def->isExtractSubregLike()) && "Invalid definition");
|
||||
// We are looking at:
|
||||
// Def = EXTRACT_SUBREG v0, sub0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1376,9 +1359,14 @@ bool ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromExtractSubreg(unsigned &SrcReg,
|
||||
if (DefSubReg)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!TII)
|
||||
// We could handle the EXTRACT_SUBREG here, but we do not want to
|
||||
// duplicate the code from the generic TII.
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
TargetInstrInfo::RegSubRegPairAndIdx ExtractSubregInputReg;
|
||||
assert(DefIdx == 0 && "Invalid definition");
|
||||
getExtractSubregInputs(*Def, ExtractSubregInputReg);
|
||||
if (!TII->getExtractSubregInputs(*Def, DefIdx, ExtractSubregInputReg))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Bails if we have to compose sub registers.
|
||||
// Likewise, if v0.subreg != 0, we would have to compose v0.subreg with sub0.
|
||||
@ -1430,7 +1418,7 @@ bool ValueTracker::getNextSourceImpl(unsigned &SrcReg, unsigned &SrcSubReg) {
|
||||
return getNextSourceFromRegSequence(SrcReg, SrcSubReg);
|
||||
if (Def->isInsertSubreg())
|
||||
return getNextSourceFromInsertSubreg(SrcReg, SrcSubReg);
|
||||
if (Def->isExtractSubreg())
|
||||
if (Def->isExtractSubreg() || Def->isExtractSubregLike())
|
||||
return getNextSourceFromExtractSubreg(SrcReg, SrcSubReg);
|
||||
if (Def->isSubregToReg())
|
||||
return getNextSourceFromSubregToReg(SrcReg, SrcSubReg);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user