RPCS3/llvm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git synced 2024-11-28 06:00:30 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[SCEV] Decrease the recursion threshold for CompareValueComplexity

Browse Source 
Fixes PR32142.

r287232 accidentally increased the recursion threshold for
CompareValueComplexity from 2 to 32.  This change reverses that change
by introducing a separate flag for CompareValueComplexity's threshold.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296992 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Sanjoy Das 2017-03-05 23:49:17 +00:00
parent e0e40c6867
commit c380db12cd
2 changed files with 48 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
View File

@ -132,10 +132,15 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> AddOpsInlineThreshold(
cl::desc("Threshold for inlining multiplication operands into a SCEV"),
cl::init(500));
static cl::opt<unsigned>
MaxCompareDepth("scalar-evolution-max-compare-depth", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Maximum depth of recursive compare complexity"),
cl::init(32));
static cl::opt<unsigned> MaxSCEVCompareDepth(
"scalar-evolution-max-scev-compare-depth", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Maximum depth of recursive SCEV complexity comparisons"),
cl::init(32));
static cl::opt<unsigned> MaxValueCompareDepth(
"scalar-evolution-max-value-compare-depth", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Maximum depth of recursive value complexity comparisons"),
cl::init(2));
static cl::opt<unsigned>
MaxAddExprDepth("scalar-evolution-max-addexpr-depth", cl::Hidden,
@ -496,7 +501,7 @@ static int
CompareValueComplexity(SmallSet<std::pair<Value *, Value *>, 8> &EqCache,
const LoopInfo *const LI, Value *LV, Value *RV,
unsigned Depth) {
if (Depth > MaxCompareDepth || EqCache.count({LV, RV}))
if (Depth > MaxValueCompareDepth || EqCache.count({LV, RV}))
return 0;
// Order pointer values after integer values. This helps SCEVExpander form
@ -583,7 +588,7 @@ static int CompareSCEVComplexity(
if (LType != RType)
return (int)LType - (int)RType;
if (Depth > MaxCompareDepth || EqCacheSCEV.count({LHS, RHS}))
if (Depth > MaxSCEVCompareDepth || EqCacheSCEV.count({LHS, RHS}))
return 0;
// Aside from the getSCEVType() ordering, the particular ordering
// isn't very important except that it's beneficial to be consistent,

38
unittests/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp
View File

@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, CommutativeExprOperandOrder) {
});
}
TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, SCEVCompareComplexity) {
TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, CompareSCEVComplexity) {
FunctionType *FTy =
FunctionType::get(Type::getVoidTy(Context), std::vector<Type *>(), false);
Function *F = cast<Function>(M.getOrInsertFunction("f", FTy));
@ -532,6 +532,42 @@ TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, SCEVCompareComplexity) {
EXPECT_NE(nullptr, SE.getSCEV(Acc[0]));
}
TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, CompareValueComplexity) {
IntegerType *IntPtrTy = M.getDataLayout().getIntPtrType(Context);
PointerType *IntPtrPtrTy = IntPtrTy->getPointerTo();
FunctionType *FTy =
FunctionType::get(Type::getVoidTy(Context), {IntPtrTy, IntPtrTy}, false);
Function *F = cast<Function>(M.getOrInsertFunction("f", FTy));
BasicBlock *EntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(Context, "entry", F);
Value *X = &*F->arg_begin();
Value *Y = &*std::next(F->arg_begin());
const int ValueDepth = 10;
for (int i = 0; i < ValueDepth; i++) {
X = new LoadInst(new IntToPtrInst(X, IntPtrPtrTy, "", EntryBB), "",
/*isVolatile*/ false, EntryBB);
Y = new LoadInst(new IntToPtrInst(Y, IntPtrPtrTy, "", EntryBB), "",
/*isVolatile*/ false, EntryBB);
}
auto *MulA = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(X, Y, "", EntryBB);
auto *MulB = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(Y, X, "", EntryBB);
ReturnInst::Create(Context, nullptr, EntryBB);
// This test isn't checking for correctness. Today making A and B resolve to
// the same SCEV would require deeper searching in CompareValueComplexity,
// which will slow down compilation. However, this test can fail (with LLVM's
// behavior still being correct) if we ever have a smarter
// CompareValueComplexity that is both fast and more accurate.
ScalarEvolution SE = buildSE(*F);
auto *A = SE.getSCEV(MulA);
auto *B = SE.getSCEV(MulB);
EXPECT_NE(A, B);
}
TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, SCEVAddExpr) {
Type *Ty32 = Type::getInt32Ty(Context);
Type *ArgTys[] = {Type::getInt64Ty(Context), Ty32};