mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2024-12-14 23:48:56 +00:00
[ObjCARC] More debug messages.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172346 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
eab0ba03cf
commit
cf14005185
@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ bool ObjCARCExpand::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
||||
|
||||
bool Changed = false;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCExpand: Visiting Function: " << F.getName() << "\n");
|
||||
|
||||
for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(&F), E = inst_end(&F); I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
Instruction *Inst = &*I;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2630,8 +2632,13 @@ ObjCARCOpt::CheckForCFGHazards(const BasicBlock *BB,
|
||||
// If the terminator is an invoke marked with the
|
||||
// clang.arc.no_objc_arc_exceptions metadata, the unwind edge can be
|
||||
// ignored, for ARC purposes.
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(TI) && TI->getMetadata(NoObjCARCExceptionsMDKind))
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(TI) && TI->getMetadata(NoObjCARCExceptionsMDKind)) {
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCOpt::CheckForCFGHazards: Found an invoke "
|
||||
"terminator marked with "
|
||||
"clang.arc.no_objc_arc_exceptions. Ignoring unwind "
|
||||
"edge.\n");
|
||||
--SE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (; SI != SE; ++SI) {
|
||||
Sequence SuccSSeq = S_None;
|
||||
@ -2684,8 +2691,13 @@ ObjCARCOpt::CheckForCFGHazards(const BasicBlock *BB,
|
||||
// If the terminator is an invoke marked with the
|
||||
// clang.arc.no_objc_arc_exceptions metadata, the unwind edge can be
|
||||
// ignored, for ARC purposes.
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(TI) && TI->getMetadata(NoObjCARCExceptionsMDKind))
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(TI) && TI->getMetadata(NoObjCARCExceptionsMDKind)) {
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCOpt::CheckForCFGHazards: Found an invoke "
|
||||
"terminator marked with "
|
||||
"clang.arc.no_objc_arc_exceptions. Ignoring unwind "
|
||||
"edge.\n");
|
||||
--SE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (; SI != SE; ++SI) {
|
||||
Sequence SuccSSeq = S_None;
|
||||
@ -2752,8 +2764,11 @@ ObjCARCOpt::VisitInstructionBottomUp(Instruction *Inst,
|
||||
// Theoretically we could implement removal of nested retain+release
|
||||
// pairs by making PtrState hold a stack of states, but this is
|
||||
// simple and avoids adding overhead for the non-nested case.
|
||||
if (S.GetSeq() == S_Release || S.GetSeq() == S_MovableRelease)
|
||||
if (S.GetSeq() == S_Release || S.GetSeq() == S_MovableRelease) {
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCOpt::VisitInstructionBottomUp: Found nested "
|
||||
"releases (i.e. a release pair)\n");
|
||||
NestingDetected = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
MDNode *ReleaseMetadata = Inst->getMetadata(ImpreciseReleaseMDKind);
|
||||
S.ResetSequenceProgress(ReleaseMetadata ? S_MovableRelease : S_Release);
|
||||
@ -2916,6 +2931,8 @@ ObjCARCOpt::VisitBottomUp(BasicBlock *BB,
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(Inst))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCOpt::VisitButtonUp: Visiting " << *Inst << "\n");
|
||||
|
||||
NestingDetected |= VisitInstructionBottomUp(Inst, BB, Retains, MyStates);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3098,6 +3115,9 @@ ObjCARCOpt::VisitTopDown(BasicBlock *BB,
|
||||
// Visit all the instructions, top-down.
|
||||
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
Instruction *Inst = I;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCOpt::VisitTopDown: Visiting " << *Inst << "\n");
|
||||
|
||||
NestingDetected |= VisitInstructionTopDown(Inst, Releases, MyStates);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3136,8 +3156,13 @@ ComputePostOrders(Function &F,
|
||||
// If the terminator is an invoke marked with the
|
||||
// clang.arc.no_objc_arc_exceptions metadata, the unwind edge can be
|
||||
// ignored, for ARC purposes.
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(TI) && TI->getMetadata(NoObjCARCExceptionsMDKind))
|
||||
if (isa<InvokeInst>(TI) && TI->getMetadata(NoObjCARCExceptionsMDKind)) {
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "ObjCARCOpt::ComputePostOrders: Found an invoke "
|
||||
"terminator marked with "
|
||||
"clang.arc.no_objc_arc_exceptions. Ignoring unwind "
|
||||
"edge.\n");
|
||||
--SE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
while (SuccStack.back().second != SE) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *SuccBB = *SuccStack.back().second++;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user