RPCS3/llvm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git synced 2025-02-26 21:56:11 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

we don't need a smallptrset to detect duplicates, the values are

Browse Source 
sorted, so we can just do a linear scan.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2009-12-31 19:49:01 +00:00
parent 1e7558b656
commit f31e2e92a8
1 changed files with 27 additions and 27 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

54
lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
View File

@ -587,20 +587,22 @@ static Value *OptimizeAndOrXor(unsigned Opcode,
assert(i < Ops.size());
if (i+1 != Ops.size() && Ops[i+1].Op == Ops[i].Op) {
if (Opcode == Instruction::And || Opcode == Instruction::Or) {
// Drop duplicate values.
// Drop duplicate values for And and Or.
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i);
--i; --e;
++NumAnnihil;
} else {
assert(Opcode == Instruction::Xor);
if (e == 2)
return Constant::getNullValue(Ops[0].Op->getType());
// ... X^X -> ...
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i, Ops.begin()+i+2);
i -= 1; e -= 2;
++NumAnnihil;
continue;
}
// Drop pairs of values for Xor.
assert(Opcode == Instruction::Xor);
if (e == 2)
return Constant::getNullValue(Ops[0].Op->getType());
// ... X^X -> ...
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i, Ops.begin()+i+2);
i -= 1; e -= 2;
++NumAnnihil;
}
}
return 0;
@ -611,31 +613,24 @@ static Value *OptimizeAndOrXor(unsigned Opcode,
/// is returned, otherwise the Ops list is mutated as necessary.
Value *Reassociate::OptimizeAdd(Instruction *I,
SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops) {
SmallPtrSet<Value*, 8> OperandsSeen;
Restart:
OperandsSeen.clear();
// Scan the operand lists looking for X and -X pairs. If we find any, we
// can simplify the expression. X+-X == 0. While we're at it, scan for any
// duplicates. We want to canonicalize Y+Y+Y+Z -> 3*Y+Z.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Value *TheOp = Ops[i].Op;
// Check to see if we've seen this operand before. If so, we factor all
// instances of the operand together.
if (!OperandsSeen.insert(TheOp)) {
// Rescan the list, removing all instances of this operand from the expr.
// instances of the operand together. Due to our sorting criteria, we know
// that these need to be next to each other in the vector.
if (i+1 != Ops.size() && Ops[i+1].Op == TheOp) {
// Rescan the list, remove all instances of this operand from the expr.
unsigned NumFound = 0;
for (unsigned j = 0, je = Ops.size(); j != je; ++j) {
if (Ops[j].Op != TheOp) continue;
do {
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i);
++NumFound;
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+j);
--j; --je;
}
} while (i != Ops.size() && Ops[i].Op == TheOp);
DEBUG(errs() << "\nFACTORING [" << NumFound << "]: " << *TheOp << '\n');
++NumFactor;
// Insert a new multiply.
Value *Mul = ConstantInt::get(cast<IntegerType>(I->getType()), NumFound);
@ -654,7 +649,10 @@ Restart:
// "A + A + B" -> "A*2 + B". Add the new multiply to the list of
// things being added by this operation.
Ops.insert(Ops.begin(), ValueEntry(getRank(Mul), Mul));
goto Restart;
--i;
e = Ops.size();
continue;
}
// Check for X and -X in the operand list.
@ -755,7 +753,9 @@ Restart:
// Create the multiply.
Value *V2 = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(V, MaxOccVal, "tmp", I);
// FIXME: Should rerun 'ReassociateExpression' on the mul too??
// Rerun associate on the multiply in case the inner expression turned into
// a multiply. We want to make sure that we keep things in canonical form.
V2 = ReassociateExpression(cast<BinaryOperator>(V2));
// If every add operand included the factor (e.g. "A*B + A*C"), then the
// entire result expression is just the multiply "A*(B+C)".