mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2025-05-13 17:06:15 +00:00
489d180cec
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r246694 | benny.kra | 2015-09-02 15:52:23 -0400 (Wed, 02 Sep 2015) | 44 lines
[RemoveDuplicatePHINodes] Start over after removing a PHI.
This makes RemoveDuplicatePHINodes more effective and fixes an assertion
failure. Triggering the assertions requires a DenseSet reallocation
so this change only contains a constructive test.
I'll explain the issue with a small example. In the following function
there's a duplicate PHI, %4 and %5 are identical. When this is found
the DenseSet in RemoveDuplicatePHINodes contains %2, %3 and %4.
define void @F() {
br label %1
; <label>:1 ; preds = %1, %0
%2 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %4, %1 ]
%3 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %5, %1 ]
%4 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ 23, %1 ]
%5 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ 23, %1 ]
br label %1
}
after RemoveDuplicatePHINodes runs the function looks like this. %3 has
changed and is now identical to %2, but RemoveDuplicatePHINodes never
saw this.
define void @F() {
br label %1
; <label>:1 ; preds = %1, %0
%2 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %4, %1 ]
%3 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %4, %1 ]
%4 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ 23, %1 ]
br label %1
}
If the DenseSet does a reallocation now it will reinsert all
keys and stumble over %3 now having a different hash value than it had
when inserted into the map for the first time. This change clears the
set whenever a PHI is deleted and starts the progress from the
beginning, allowing %3 to be deleted and avoiding inconsistent DenseSet
state. This potentially has a negative performance impact because
it rescans all PHIs, but I don't think that this ever makes a difference
in practice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@252938 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8