llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll
Adam Nemet 7a6f54545f [LAA] Revert a small part of r239295
This commit ([LAA] Fix estimation of number of memchecks) regressed the
logic a bit.  We shouldn't quit the analysis if we encounter a pointer
without known bounds *unless* we actually need to emit a memcheck for
it.

The original code was using NumComparisons which is now computed
differently.  Instead I compute NeedRTCheck from NumReadPtrChecks and
NumWritePtrChecks.

As side note, I find the separation of NeedRTCheck and CanDoRT
confusing, so I will try to merge them in a follow-up patch.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-07-08 22:58:48 +00:00

43 lines
1.3 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
; We shouldn't quit the analysis if we encounter a pointer without known
; bounds *unless* we actually need to emit a memcheck for it. (We only
; compute bounds for SCEVAddRecs so A[i*I] is deemed not having known bounds.)
;
; for (i = 0; i < 20; ++i)
; A[i*i] *= 2;
; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop
; CHECK-NOT: Report: cannot identify array bounds
; CHECK: Interesting Dependences:
; CHECK: Unknown:
; CHECK: %loadA = load i16, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
; CHECK: store i16 %mul, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2
define void @f(i16* %a) {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.body: ; preds = %for.body, %entry
%ind = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %for.body ]
%access_ind = mul i64 %ind, %ind
%arrayidxA = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %a, i64 %access_ind
%loadA = load i16, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2
%mul = mul i16 %loadA, 2
store i16 %mul, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2
%add = add nuw nsw i64 %ind, 1
%exitcond = icmp eq i64 %add, 20
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
ret void
}