mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2025-01-11 06:56:12 +00:00
908d4514f6
by my refactoring of this code. The method isSafeToLoadUnconditionally assumes that the load will proceed with the preferred type alignment. Given that, it has to ensure that the alloca or global is at least that aligned. It has always done this historically when a datalayout is present, but has never checked it when the datalayout is absent. When I refactored the code in r220156, I exposed this path when datalayout was present and that turned the latent bug into a patent bug. This fixes the issue by just removing the special case which allows folding things without datalayout. This isn't worth the complexity of trying to tease apart when it is or isn't safe without actually knowing the preferred alignment. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220161 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//