mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm.git
synced 2025-02-04 09:37:20 +00:00
9d4c13124a
If the loaded type sizes don't match the element type of the sequential type, all bets are off and the addresses may, indeed, overlap. Surprisingly, this just got caught in one test, on one builder, out of the 30+ builders testing this change. Congratulations go to http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-aarch64-lnt/builds/5205. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//