David Blaikie ee8af3e2a0 Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines. ... This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost. The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for "DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct behavior is attained. (also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
..
llvm	Recommit r208506: DebugInfo: Include lexical scopes in inlined subroutines.	2014-05-14 01:08:28 +00:00
llvm-c	Split GlobalValue into GlobalValue and GlobalObject.	2014-05-13 18:45:48 +00:00