The typical use is a library vote function which
compares to 0. Fold the user condition into the intrinsic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is a follow-up on r297580. It fixes the FIXME added temporarily
by that commit to keep the removal of Unroller's specialized version of
scalarizeInstruction() an NFC. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D30715 for details.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297610 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unroller's specialized scalarizeInstruction() is mostly duplicating Vectorizer's
variant. OTOH Vectorizer's scalarizeInstruction() already supports the special
case of VF==1 except for avoiding mask-bit extraction in that case. This patch
removes Unroller's specialized version in favor of a unified method.
The only functional difference between the two variants seems to be setting
memcheck metadata for loads and stores only in Vectorizer's variant, which is a
bug in Unroller. To keep this patch an NFC the unified method doesn't set
memcheck metadata for VF==1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30715
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297580 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts r293386, r294027, r294029 and r296411.
Turns out the SLP tree isn't actually a "tree" and we don't handle
accessing the same packet of loads in several different orders well,
causing miscompiles.
Revert until we can fix this properly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It was introduced in:
r296945
WholeProgramDevirt: Implement exporting for single-impl devirtualization.
---------------------
r296939
WholeProgramDevirt: Add any unsuccessful llvm.type.checked.load devirtualizations to the list of llvm.type.test users.
---------------------
Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2015
Version 14.0.23107.0 D14REL
Does not compile that code without additional brackets, showing multiple error like below:
WholeProgramDevirt.cpp(1216): error C2958: the left bracket '[' found at 'c:\access_softek\llvm\lib\transforms\ipo\wholeprogramdevirt.cpp(1216)' was not matched correctly
WholeProgramDevirt.cpp(1216): error C2143: syntax error: missing ']' before '}'
WholeProgramDevirt.cpp(1216): error C2143: syntax error: missing ';' before '}'
WholeProgramDevirt.cpp(1216): error C2059: syntax error: ']'
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The insertion point may be later than the next instruction,
so it is necessary to set it when replacing the call.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297439 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
These are the functions used to determine when values of loads can be
extracted from stores, etc, and to perform the necessary insertions to
do this. There are no changes to the functions themselves except
reformatting, and one case where memdep was informed of a removed load
(which was pushed into the caller).
Reviewers: davide
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30478
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297438 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
entire SCC before iterating on newly-introduced call edges resulting
from any inlined function bodies.
This more closely matches the behavior of the old PM's inliner. While it
wasn't really clear to me initially, this behavior is actually essential
to the inliner behaving reasonably in its current design.
Because the inliner is fundamentally a bottom-up inliner and all of its
cost modeling is designed around that it often runs into trouble within
an SCC where we don't have any meaningful bottom-up ordering to use. In
addition to potentially cyclic, infinite inlining that we block with the
inline history mechanism, it can also take seemingly simple call graph
patterns within an SCC and turn them into *insanely* large functions by
accidentally working top-down across the SCC without any of the
threshold limitations that traditional top-down inliners use.
Consider this diabolical monster.cpp file that Richard Smith came up
with to help demonstrate this issue:
```
template <int N> extern const char *str;
void g(const char *);
template <bool K, int N> void f(bool *B, bool *E) {
if (K)
g(str<N>);
if (B == E)
return;
if (*B)
f<true, N + 1>(B + 1, E);
else
f<false, N + 1>(B + 1, E);
}
template <> void f<false, MAX>(bool *B, bool *E) { return f<false, 0>(B, E); }
template <> void f<true, MAX>(bool *B, bool *E) { return f<true, 0>(B, E); }
extern bool *arr, *end;
void test() { f<false, 0>(arr, end); }
```
When compiled with '-DMAX=N' for various values of N, this will create an SCC
with a reasonably large number of functions. Previously, the inliner would try
to exhaust the inlining candidates in a single function before moving on. This,
unfortunately, turns it into a top-down inliner within the SCC. Because our
thresholds were never built for that, we will incrementally decide that it is
always worth inlining and proceed to flatten the entire SCC into that one
function.
What's worse, we'll then proceed to the next function, and do the exact same
thing except we'll skip the first function, and so on. And at each step, we'll
also make some of the constant factors larger, which is awesome.
The fix in this patch is the obvious one which makes the new PM's inliner use
the same technique used by the old PM: consider all the call edges across the
entire SCC before beginning to process call edges introduced by inlining. The
result of this is essentially to distribute the inlining across the SCC so that
every function incrementally grows toward the inline thresholds rather than
allowing the inliner to grow one of the functions vastly beyond the threshold.
The code for this is a bit awkward, but it works out OK.
We could consider in the future doing something more powerful here such as
prioritized order (via lowest cost and/or profile info) and/or a code-growth
budget per SCC. However, both of those would require really substantial work
both to design the system in a way that wouldn't break really useful
abstraction decomposition properties of the current inliner and to be tuned
across a reasonably diverse set of code and workloads. It also seems really
risky in many ways. I have only found a single real-world file that triggers
the bad behavior here and it is generated code that has a pretty pathological
pattern. I'm not worried about the inliner not doing an *awesome* job here as
long as it does *ok*. On the other hand, the cases that will be tricky to get
right in a prioritized scheme with a budget will be more common and idiomatic
for at least some frontends (C++ and Rust at least). So while these approaches
are still really interesting, I'm not in a huge rush to go after them. Staying
even closer to the existing PM's behavior, especially when this easy to do,
seems like the right short to medium term approach.
I don't really have a test case that makes sense yet... I'll try to find a
variant of the IR produced by the monster template metaprogram that is both
small enough to be sane and large enough to clearly show when we get this wrong
in the future. But I'm not confident this exists. And the behavior change here
*should* be unobservable without snooping on debug logging. So there isn't
really much to test.
The test case updates come from two incidental changes:
1) We now visit functions in an SCC in the opposite order. I don't think there
really is a "right" order here, so I just update the test cases.
2) We no longer compute some analyses when an SCC has no call instructions that
we consider for inlining.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297374 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In a .symver assembler directive like:
.symver name, name2@@nodename
"name2@@nodename" should get the same symbol binding as "name".
While the ELF object writer is updating the symbol binding for .symver
aliases before emitting the object file, not doing so when the module
inline assembly is handled by the RecordStreamer is causing the wrong
behavior in *LTO mode.
E.g. when "name" is global, "name2@@nodename" must also be marked as
global. Otherwise, the symbol is skipped when iterating over the LTO
InputFile symbols (InputFile::Symbol::shouldSkip). So, for example,
when performing any *LTO via the gold-plugin, the versioned symbol
definition is not recorded by the plugin and passed back to the
linker. If the object was in an archive, and there were no other symbols
needed from that object, the object would not be included in the final
link and references to the versioned symbol are undefined.
The llvm-lto2 tests added will give an error about an unused symbol
resolution without the fix.
Reviewers: rafael, pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30485
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
!type metadata can not be dropped. An alternative to this is adding
!type metadata from the replaced globals to the replacement, but that
may weaken type tests and make them slower at the same time.
The merged global gets !dbg metadata from replaced globals, and can
end up with multiple debug locations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analyzing larger trees is extremely difficult with the current debug output so
this adds GraphTraits and DOTGraphTraits on top of the VectorizableTree data
structure. We can now display the SLP trees with Graphviz as in
https://reviews.llvm.org/F3132765.
I decorated the graph where a value needs to be gathered for one reason or
another. These are the red nodes.
There are other improvement I am planning to make as I work through my case
here. For example, I would also like to mark nodes that need to be extracted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30731
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297303 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Because IRBuilder performs constant-folding, it's not guaranteed that an
instruction in the original loop map to an instruction in the vector loop. It
could map to a constant vector instead. The handling of first-order recurrences
was incorrectly making this assumption when setting the IRBuilder's insert
point.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297302 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recommitting patch which was previously reverted in r297159. These
changes should address the casting issues.
The original patch enables dbg.value intrinsics to be attached to
newly inserted PHI nodes.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30701
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The purpose of coro.end intrinsic is to allow frontends to mark the cleanup and
other code that is only relevant during the initial invocation of the coroutine
and should not be present in resume and destroy parts.
In landing pads coro.end is replaced with an appropriate instruction to unwind to
caller. The handling of coro.end differs depending on whether the target is
using landingpad or WinEH exception model.
For landingpad based exception model, it is expected that frontend uses the
`coro.end`_ intrinsic as follows:
```
ehcleanup:
%InResumePart = call i1 @llvm.coro.end(i8* null, i1 true)
br i1 %InResumePart, label %eh.resume, label %cleanup.cont
cleanup.cont:
; rest of the cleanup
eh.resume:
%exn = load i8*, i8** %exn.slot, align 8
%sel = load i32, i32* %ehselector.slot, align 4
%lpad.val = insertvalue { i8*, i32 } undef, i8* %exn, 0
%lpad.val29 = insertvalue { i8*, i32 } %lpad.val, i32 %sel, 1
resume { i8*, i32 } %lpad.val29
```
The `CoroSpit` pass replaces `coro.end` with ``True`` in the resume functions,
thus leading to immediate unwind to the caller, whereas in start function it
is replaced with ``False``, thus allowing to proceed to the rest of the cleanup
code that is only needed during initial invocation of the coroutine.
For Windows Exception handling model, a frontend should attach a funclet bundle
referring to an enclosing cleanuppad as follows:
```
ehcleanup:
%tok = cleanuppad within none []
%unused = call i1 @llvm.coro.end(i8* null, i1 true) [ "funclet"(token %tok) ]
cleanupret from %tok unwind label %RestOfTheCleanup
```
The `CoroSplit` pass, if the funclet bundle is present, will insert
``cleanupret from %tok unwind to caller`` before
the `coro.end`_ intrinsic and will remove the rest of the block.
Reviewers: majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25543
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297223 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When expanding the set of uniform instructions beyond the seed instructions
(e.g., consecutive pointers), we mark a new instruction uniform if all its
loop-varying users are uniform. We should also allow users that are consecutive
or interleaved memory accesses. This fixes cases where we have an instruction
that is used as the pointer operand of a consecutive access but also used by a
non-memory instruction that later becomes uniform as part of the expansion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297179 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r296488.
As noted by David Blaikie on llvm-commits, I overlooked the case of a
debug function being inlined into a nodebug function being inlined
into a debug function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297163 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We should check if loop size allows us to peel at least one iteration
before we do so.
Patch by Max Kazantsev!
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkuper, efriedma
Reviewed By: mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30632
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297122 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: We do not need that special handling because the debug info is more accurate now. Performance testing shows no regression on google internal benchmarks.
Reviewers: davidxl, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30658
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@297038 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
