Add missing fabs(fpext) optimzation that worked with the call,
and also fixes it creating a second fpext when there were multiple
uses.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Min/max canonicalization (r287585) exposes the fact that we're missing combines for min/max patterns.
This patch won't solve the example that was attached to that thread, so something else still needs fixing.
The line between InstCombine and InstSimplify gets blurry here because sometimes the icmp instruction that
we want to fold to already exists, but sometimes it's the swapped form of what we want.
Corresponding changes for smax/umin/umax to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27531
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Pattern match has some paths which can operate on constant instructions,
but not all. This adds a version of m_value() to return const Value* and
changes ICmp matching to use auto so that it can match both constant and
mutable instructions.
Tests also included for both mutable and constant ICmpInst matching.
This will be used in a future commit to constify ValueTracking.cpp.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
No matter what value you OR in to A, the result of (or A, B) is going to be UGE A. When A and B are positive, it's SGE too. If A is negative, OR'ing a value into it can't make it positive, but can increase its value closer to -1, therefore (or A, B) is SGE A. Working through all possible combinations produces this truth table:
```
A is
+, -, +/-
F F F + B is
T F ? -
? F ? +/-
```
The related optimizations are flipping the 'slt' for 'sge' which always NOTs the result (if the result is known), and swapping the LHS and RHS while swapping the comparison predicate.
There are more idioms left to implement (aren't there always!) but I've stopped here because any more would risk becoming unreasonable for reviewers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was breaking the modules build and is being reverted while we reach consensus on the right way to solve this layering problem. This reverts commit r251785.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead of rolling our own min/max matching code (which is notoriously
hard to get completely right), use ValueTracking's instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
`signum(x)` is sometimes implemented as `(x >> 63) | (-x >>> 63)` (for
an `i64` `x`). This change adds a matcher for that pattern, and an
instcombine rule to optimize `signum(x) s< 1`.
Later, we can also consider optimizing:
icmp slt signum(x), 0 --> icmp slt x, 0
icmp sle signum(x), 1 --> true
etc.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12703
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@247846 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change moves creating calls to `llvm.uadd.with.overflow` from
InstCombine to CodeGenPrep. Combining overflow check patterns into
calls to the said intrinsic in InstCombine inhibits optimization because
it introduces an intrinsic call that not all other transforms and
analyses understand.
Depends on D8888.
Reviewers: majnemer, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8889
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234638 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(X & INT_MIN) ? X & INT_MAX : X into X & INT_MAX
(X & INT_MIN) ? X : X & INT_MAX into X
(X & INT_MIN) ? X | INT_MIN : X into X
(X & INT_MIN) ? X : X | INT_MIN into X | INT_MIN
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224669 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Tidy up the code a little by using 'auto' when the type is obvious, doxify the
comments, and clang-format the file.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rewrite the pattern match code to work also with Values instead with
Instructions only. Also remove the no longer need matcher (m_Instruction).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are named following the IEEE-754 names for these
functions, rather than the libm fmin / fmax to avoid
possible ambiguities. Some languages may implement something
resembling fmin / fmax which return NaN if either operand is
to propagate errors. These implement the IEEE-754 semantics
of returning the other operand if either is a NaN representing
missing data.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
consider:
long long *f(long long *b, long long *e) {
return b + (e - b);
}
we would lower this to something like:
define i64* @f(i64* %b, i64* %e) {
%1 = ptrtoint i64* %e to i64
%2 = ptrtoint i64* %b to i64
%3 = sub i64 %1, %2
%4 = ashr exact i64 %3, 3
%5 = getelementptr inbounds i64* %b, i64 %4
ret i64* %5
}
This should fold away to just 'e'.
N.B. This adds m_SpecificInt as a convenient way to match against a
particular 64-bit integer when using LLVM's match interface.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216439 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
