2006-02-03 06:21:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Target Independent Opportunities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FreeBench/mason contains code like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static p_type m0u(p_type p) {
|
|
|
|
int m[]={0, 8, 1, 2, 16, 5, 13, 7, 14, 9, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 10, 17, 6};
|
|
|
|
p_type pu;
|
|
|
|
pu.a = m[p.a];
|
|
|
|
pu.b = m[p.b];
|
|
|
|
pu.c = m[p.c];
|
|
|
|
return pu;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We currently compile this into a memcpy from a static array into 'm', then
|
|
|
|
a bunch of loads from m. It would be better to avoid the memcpy and just do
|
|
|
|
loads from the static array.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-17 01:40:33 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make the PPC branch selector target independant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-02-03 06:21:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Get the C front-end to expand hypot(x,y) -> llvm.sqrt(x*x+y*y) when errno and
|
|
|
|
precision don't matter (ffastmath). Misc/mandel will like this. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solve this DAG isel folding deficiency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int X, Y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void fn1(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
X = X | (Y << 3);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compiles to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn1:
|
|
|
|
movl Y, %eax
|
|
|
|
shll $3, %eax
|
|
|
|
orl X, %eax
|
|
|
|
movl %eax, X
|
|
|
|
ret
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is the store's chain operand is not the load X but rather
|
|
|
|
a TokenFactor of the load X and load Y, which prevents the folding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to fix this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The dag combiner can start using alias analysis to realize that y/x
|
|
|
|
don't alias, making the store to X not dependent on the load from Y.
|
|
|
|
2. The generated isel could be made smarter in the case it can't
|
|
|
|
disambiguate the pointers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number 1 is the preferred solution.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-13 23:19:10 +00:00
|
|
|
This has been "fixed" by a TableGen hack. But that is a short term workaround
|
|
|
|
which will be removed once the proper fix is made.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 06:21:43 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-21 18:29:44 +00:00
|
|
|
Turn this into a signed shift right in instcombine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int f(unsigned x) {
|
|
|
|
return x >> 31 ? -1 : 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25600
|
|
|
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01492.html
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-02 22:34:38 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-04 01:19:34 +00:00
|
|
|
On targets with expensive 64-bit multiply, we could LSR this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = ...; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
x = 1ULL << i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into:
|
|
|
|
long long tmp = 1;
|
|
|
|
for (i = ...; ++i, tmp+=tmp)
|
|
|
|
x = tmp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This would be a win on ppc32, but not x86 or ppc64.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-04 08:44:51 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-03-05 20:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shrink: (setlt (loadi32 P), 0) -> (setlt (loadi8 Phi), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-03-07 02:46:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-11 20:17:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Reassociate should turn: X*X*X*X -> t=(X*X) (t*t) to eliminate a multiply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-11 20:20:40 +00:00
|
|
|
Interesting? testcase for add/shift/mul reassoc:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int bar(int x, int y) {
|
|
|
|
return x*x*x+y+x*x*x*x*x*y*y*y*y;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int foo(int z, int n) {
|
|
|
|
return bar(z, n) + bar(2*z, 2*n);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-09 20:13:21 +00:00
|
|
|
These two functions should generate the same code on big-endian systems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int g(int *j,int *l) { return memcmp(j,l,4); }
|
|
|
|
int h(int *j, int *l) { return *j - *l; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this could be done in SelectionDAGISel.cpp, along with other special cases,
|
|
|
|
for 1,2,4,8 bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-14 19:31:24 +00:00
|
|
|
This code:
|
|
|
|
int rot(unsigned char b) { int a = ((b>>1) ^ (b<<7)) & 0xff; return a; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can be improved in two ways:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The instcombiner should eliminate the type conversions.
|
|
|
|
2. The X86 backend should turn this into a rotate by one bit.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-19 06:09:23 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add LSR exit value substitution. It'll probably be a win for Ackermann, etc.
|
2006-03-22 07:33:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice to revert this patch:
|
|
|
|
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060213/031986.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And teach the dag combiner enough to simplify the code expanded before
|
|
|
|
legalize. It seems plausible that this knowledge would let it simplify other
|
|
|
|
stuff too.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 19:59:17 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loop unroller should be enhanced to be able to unroll loops that aren't
|
|
|
|
single basic blocks. It should be able to handle stuff like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < c1; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if (c2 & (1 << i))
|
|
|
|
foo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where c1/c2 are constants.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-31 22:35:14 +00:00
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-03-24 19:59:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-31 22:35:14 +00:00
|
|
|
For packed types, TargetData.cpp::getTypeInfo() returns alignment that is equal
|
|
|
|
to the type size. It works but can be overly conservative as the alignment of
|
|
|
|
specific packed types are target dependent.
|
2006-04-01 04:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We should add 'unaligned load/store' nodes, and produce them from code like
|
|
|
|
this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v4sf example(float *P) {
|
|
|
|
return (v4sf){P[0], P[1], P[2], P[3] };
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-02 01:47:20 +00:00
|
|
|
We should constant fold packed type casts at the LLVM level, regardless of the
|
|
|
|
cast. Currently we cannot fold some casts because we don't have TargetData
|
|
|
|
information in the constant folder, so we don't know the endianness of the
|
|
|
|
target!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-04-20 18:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned short swap_16(unsigned short v) { return (v>>8) | (v<<8); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compiled with the ppc backend:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_swap_16:
|
|
|
|
slwi r2, r3, 8
|
|
|
|
srwi r3, r3, 8
|
|
|
|
or r2, r3, r2
|
|
|
|
rlwinm r3, r2, 0, 16, 31
|
|
|
|
blr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rlwinm (an and by 65535) is dead. The dag combiner should propagate bits
|
|
|
|
better than that to see this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-05-18 18:26:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add support for conditional increments, and other related patterns. Instead
|
|
|
|
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
movl 136(%esp), %eax
|
|
|
|
cmpl $0, %eax
|
|
|
|
je LBB16_2 #cond_next
|
|
|
|
LBB16_1: #cond_true
|
|
|
|
incl _foo
|
|
|
|
LBB16_2: #cond_next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
emit:
|
|
|
|
movl _foo, %eax
|
|
|
|
cmpl $1, %edi
|
|
|
|
sbbl $-1, %eax
|
|
|
|
movl %eax, _foo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2006-05-19 20:45:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combine: a = sin(x), b = cos(x) into a,b = sincos(x).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand these to calls of sin/cos and stores:
|
|
|
|
double sincos(double x, double *sin, double *cos);
|
|
|
|
float sincosf(float x, float *sin, float *cos);
|
|
|
|
long double sincosl(long double x, long double *sin, long double *cos);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doing so could allow SROA of the destination pointers. See also:
|
|
|
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|