Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mcpu=pwr7 < %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
target datalayout = "E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64"
|
|
|
|
target triple = "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test1(float %v1, float %v2) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = fcmp oge float %v1, %v2
|
|
|
|
%cmp2 = fcmp ole float %v2, 0.000000e+00
|
|
|
|
%and5 = and i1 %cmp, %cmp2
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %and5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: fcmpu {{[0-9]+}}, 1, 2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: lfs [[REG2:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: fcmpu {{[0-9]+}}, 2, [[REG2]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnor
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnor
|
2014-02-28 06:11:16 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnand [[REG4:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 0, [[REG1]], [[REG4]]
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test2(float %v1, float %v2) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = fcmp oge float %v1, %v2
|
|
|
|
%cmp2 = fcmp ole float %v2, 0.000000e+00
|
|
|
|
%xor5 = xor i1 %cmp, %cmp2
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %xor5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: fcmpu {{[0-9]+}}, 1, 2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: lfs [[REG2:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: fcmpu {{[0-9]+}}, 2, [[REG2]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnor
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnor
|
2014-02-28 06:11:16 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: creqv [[REG4:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 0, [[REG1]], [[REG4]]
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test3(float %v1, float %v2, i32 signext %x) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = fcmp oge float %v1, %v2
|
|
|
|
%cmp2 = fcmp ole float %v2, 0.000000e+00
|
|
|
|
%cmp4 = icmp ne i32 %x, -2
|
|
|
|
%and7 = and i1 %cmp2, %cmp4
|
|
|
|
%xor8 = xor i1 %cmp, %and7
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %xor8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: fcmpu {{[0-9]+}}, 1, 2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: lfs [[REG2:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: fcmpu {{[0-9]+}}, 2, [[REG2]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnor
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crnor
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: crandc
|
2014-02-28 06:11:16 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: creqv [[REG4:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 0, [[REG1]], [[REG4]]
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test4(i1 zeroext %v1, i1 zeroext %v2, i1 zeroext %v3) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%and8 = and i1 %v1, %v2
|
|
|
|
%or9 = or i1 %and8, %v3
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %or9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: @test4
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: and [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 3, 4
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: or 3, [[REG1]], 5
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test5(i1 zeroext %v1, i1 zeroext %v2, i32 signext %v3) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%and6 = and i1 %v1, %v2
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %v3, -2
|
|
|
|
%or7 = or i1 %and6, %cmp
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %or7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test5
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: and [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 3, 4
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: cmpwi {{[0-9]+}}, 5, -2
|
2014-02-28 06:11:16 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG3:[0-9]+]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: andi. {{[0-9]+}}, [[REG1]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: crandc [[REG5:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 0, [[REG3]], [[REG5]]
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i1 @test6(i1 zeroext %v1, i1 zeroext %v2, i32 signext %v3) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %v3, -2
|
|
|
|
%or6 = or i1 %cmp, %v2
|
|
|
|
%and7 = and i1 %or6, %v1
|
|
|
|
ret i1 %and7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test6
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: andi. {{[0-9]+}}, 3, 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: cmpwi {{[0-9]+}}, 5, -2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: cror [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 1, 1
|
2014-02-28 06:11:16 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: andi. {{[0-9]+}}, 4, 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG2:[0-9]+]], 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: crorc [[REG4:[0-9]+]], 1,
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: crnand [[REG5:[0-9]+]], [[REG4]], [[REG1]]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 0, [[REG2]], [[REG5]]
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define signext i32 @test7(i1 zeroext %v2, i32 signext %i1, i32 signext %i2) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cond = select i1 %v2, i32 %i1, i32 %i2
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %cond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test7
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: andi. {{[0-9]+}}, 3, 1
|
Remove extra truncs/exts around i32 bit operations on PPC64
This generalizes the code to eliminate extra truncs/exts around i1 bit
operations to also do the same on PPC64 for i32 bit operations. This eliminates
a fairly prevalent code wart:
int foo(int a) {
return a == 5 ? 7 : 8;
}
On PPC64, because of the extension implied by the ABI, this would generate:
cmplwi 0, 3, 5
li 12, 8
li 4, 7
isel 3, 4, 12, 2
rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
blr
where the 'rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32', the extension, is completely unnecessary. At
least for the single-BB case (which is all that the DAG combine mechanism can
handle), this unnecessary extension is no longer generated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202600 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-01 21:36:57 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 4, 5, 1
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Remove extra truncs/exts around i32 bit operations on PPC64
This generalizes the code to eliminate extra truncs/exts around i1 bit
operations to also do the same on PPC64 for i32 bit operations. This eliminates
a fairly prevalent code wart:
int foo(int a) {
return a == 5 ? 7 : 8;
}
On PPC64, because of the extension implied by the ABI, this would generate:
cmplwi 0, 3, 5
li 12, 8
li 4, 7
isel 3, 4, 12, 2
rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
blr
where the 'rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32', the extension, is completely unnecessary. At
least for the single-BB case (which is all that the DAG combine mechanism can
handle), this unnecessary extension is no longer generated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202600 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-01 21:36:57 +00:00
|
|
|
define signext i32 @exttest7(i32 signext %a) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, 5
|
|
|
|
%cond = select i1 %cmp, i32 7, i32 8
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %cond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @exttest7
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: cmplwi {{[0-9]+}}, 3, 5
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG1:[0-9]+]], 8
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG2:[0-9]+]], 7
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, [[REG2]], [[REG1]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: rldicl
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define zeroext i32 @exttest8() #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%v0 = load i64* undef, align 8
|
|
|
|
%sub = sub i64 80, %v0
|
|
|
|
%div = lshr i64 %sub, 1
|
|
|
|
%conv13 = trunc i64 %div to i32
|
|
|
|
%cmp14 = icmp ugt i32 %conv13, 80
|
|
|
|
%.conv13 = select i1 %cmp14, i32 0, i32 %conv13
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %.conv13
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @exttest8
|
|
|
|
; This is a don't-crash test: %conv13 is both one of the possible select output
|
|
|
|
; values and also an input to the conditional feeding it.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define float @test8(i1 zeroext %v2, float %v1, float %v3) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%cond = select i1 %v2, float %v1, float %v3
|
|
|
|
ret float %cond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test8
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: andi. {{[0-9]+}}, 3, 1
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: bclr 12, 1, 0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: fmr 1, 2
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
|
|
|
|
define signext i32 @test10(i32 signext %v1, i32 signext %v2) #0 {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %v1, 0
|
|
|
|
%lnot = icmp eq i32 %v2, 0
|
|
|
|
%and3 = and i1 %tobool, %lnot
|
|
|
|
%and = zext i1 %and3 to i32
|
|
|
|
ret i32 %and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @test10
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: cmpwi {{[0-9]+}}, 3, 0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: cmpwi {{[0-9]+}}, 4, 0
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: li [[REG2:[0-9]+]], 1
|
2014-02-28 06:11:16 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: crorc [[REG3:[0-9]+]],
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: isel 3, 0, [[REG2]], [[REG3]]
|
Add CR-bit tracking to the PowerPC backend for i1 values
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-28 00:27:01 +00:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: blr
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributes #0 = { nounwind readnone }
|
|
|
|
|