Remove an overly-aggressive assertion. The code following this assertion already knows how to handle the case where DstRC was NULL, so it's not actually protecting us from anything, and this pattern can come up when using unknown_class operands in the SelectionDAG.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163736 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Owen Anderson 2012-09-12 20:09:19 +00:00
parent 01b50ca5b3
commit 045ca86bb3

View File

@ -314,8 +314,6 @@ InstrEmitter::AddRegisterOperand(MachineInstr *MI, SDValue Op,
const TargetRegisterClass *DstRC = 0;
if (IIOpNum < II->getNumOperands())
DstRC = TRI->getAllocatableClass(TII->getRegClass(*II,IIOpNum,TRI,*MF));
assert((DstRC || (MI->isVariadic() && IIOpNum >= MCID.getNumOperands())) &&
"Don't have operand info for this instruction!");
if (DstRC && !MRI->constrainRegClass(VReg, DstRC, MinRCSize)) {
unsigned NewVReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(DstRC);
BuildMI(*MBB, InsertPos, Op.getNode()->getDebugLoc(),