mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2024-11-24 20:29:53 +00:00
Generalize ScalarEvolution's PHI analysis to handle loops that don't
have preheaders or dedicated exit blocks, as clients may not otherwise need to run LoopSimplify. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101030 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
646e047765
commit
27dead44e0
@ -2597,14 +2597,29 @@ ScalarEvolution::ForgetSymbolicName(Instruction *PN, const SCEV *SymName) {
|
||||
/// a loop header, making it a potential recurrence, or it doesn't.
|
||||
///
|
||||
const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
|
||||
if (PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2) // The loops have been canonicalized.
|
||||
if (const Loop *L = LI->getLoopFor(PN->getParent()))
|
||||
if (L->getHeader() == PN->getParent()) {
|
||||
// If it lives in the loop header, it has two incoming values, one
|
||||
// from outside the loop, and one from inside.
|
||||
unsigned IncomingEdge = L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(0));
|
||||
unsigned BackEdge = IncomingEdge^1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (const Loop *L = LI->getLoopFor(PN->getParent()))
|
||||
if (L->getHeader() == PN->getParent()) {
|
||||
// The loop may have multiple entrances or multiple exits; we can analyze
|
||||
// this phi as an addrec if it has a unique entry value and a unique
|
||||
// backedge value.
|
||||
Value *BEValueV = 0, *StartValueV = 0;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
Value *V = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
|
||||
if (L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(i))) {
|
||||
if (!BEValueV) {
|
||||
BEValueV = V;
|
||||
} else if (BEValueV != V) {
|
||||
BEValueV = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!StartValueV) {
|
||||
StartValueV = V;
|
||||
} else if (StartValueV != V) {
|
||||
StartValueV = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (BEValueV && StartValueV) {
|
||||
// While we are analyzing this PHI node, handle its value symbolically.
|
||||
const SCEV *SymbolicName = getUnknown(PN);
|
||||
assert(Scalars.find(PN) == Scalars.end() &&
|
||||
@ -2613,7 +2628,6 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Using this symbolic name for the PHI, analyze the value coming around
|
||||
// the back-edge.
|
||||
Value *BEValueV = PN->getIncomingValue(BackEdge);
|
||||
const SCEV *BEValue = getSCEV(BEValueV);
|
||||
|
||||
// NOTE: If BEValue is loop invariant, we know that the PHI node just
|
||||
@ -2657,8 +2671,7 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
|
||||
HasNSW = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const SCEV *StartVal =
|
||||
getSCEV(PN->getIncomingValue(IncomingEdge));
|
||||
const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
|
||||
const SCEV *PHISCEV =
|
||||
getAddRecExpr(StartVal, Accum, L, HasNUW, HasNSW);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2684,7 +2697,7 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
|
||||
// Because the other in-value of i (0) fits the evolution of BEValue
|
||||
// i really is an addrec evolution.
|
||||
if (AddRec->getLoop() == L && AddRec->isAffine()) {
|
||||
const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(PN->getIncomingValue(IncomingEdge));
|
||||
const SCEV *StartVal = getSCEV(StartValueV);
|
||||
|
||||
// If StartVal = j.start - j.stride, we can use StartVal as the
|
||||
// initial step of the addrec evolution.
|
||||
@ -2702,9 +2715,8 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI(PHINode *PN) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return SymbolicName;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the PHI has a single incoming value, follow that value, unless the
|
||||
// PHI's incoming blocks are in a different loop, in which case doing so
|
||||
|
29
test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/unsimplified-loop.ll
Normal file
29
test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/unsimplified-loop.ll
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
; RUN: opt -analyze -scalar-evolution < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; This loop has no preheader, multiple backedges, etc., but ScalarEvolution
|
||||
; should still be able to analyze it.
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK: %i = phi i64 [ 5, %entry ], [ 5, %alt ], [ %i.next, %loop.a ], [ %i.next, %loop.b ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: --> {5,+,1}<%loop>
|
||||
|
||||
define void @foo(i1 %p, i1 %q, i1 %s, i1 %u) {
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br i1 %p, label %loop, label %alt
|
||||
|
||||
alt:
|
||||
br i1 %s, label %loop, label %exit
|
||||
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
%i = phi i64 [ 5, %entry ], [ 5, %alt ], [ %i.next, %loop.a ], [ %i.next, %loop.b ]
|
||||
%i.next = add i64 %i, 1
|
||||
br i1 %q, label %loop.a, label %loop.b
|
||||
|
||||
loop.a:
|
||||
br label %loop
|
||||
|
||||
loop.b:
|
||||
br i1 %u, label %loop, label %exit
|
||||
|
||||
exit:
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user