AsmWriter: Avoid O(N^2) processing of metadata

Fix embarrassing bugs I introduced to the `SlotTracker` in or around
r235785.  I had us iterating through every instruction in a function
(and hitting a map in the LLVMContext) for every basic block in the
function.

While there, completely avoid the call to
`SlotTracker::processFunctionMetadata()` from
`SlotTracker::processFunction()` if we've speculatively done this
already in `SlotTracker::processModule()` by checking
`ShouldInitializeAllMetadata` (this wasn't an algorithmic problem, but
it's touching the same line of code).

Fixes PR24699.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@247372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 2015-09-11 01:34:59 +00:00
parent 5db3146110
commit 812e1e45de

View File

@ -807,6 +807,10 @@ void SlotTracker::processFunction() {
ST_DEBUG("begin processFunction!\n");
fNext = 0;
// Process function metadata if it wasn't hit at the module-level.
if (!ShouldInitializeAllMetadata)
processFunctionMetadata(*TheFunction);
// Add all the function arguments with no names.
for(Function::const_arg_iterator AI = TheFunction->arg_begin(),
AE = TheFunction->arg_end(); AI != AE; ++AI)
@ -820,8 +824,6 @@ void SlotTracker::processFunction() {
if (!BB.hasName())
CreateFunctionSlot(&BB);
processFunctionMetadata(*TheFunction);
for (auto &I : BB) {
if (!I.getType()->isVoidTy() && !I.hasName())
CreateFunctionSlot(&I);
@ -849,11 +851,11 @@ void SlotTracker::processFunction() {
void SlotTracker::processFunctionMetadata(const Function &F) {
SmallVector<std::pair<unsigned, MDNode *>, 4> MDs;
for (auto &BB : F) {
F.getAllMetadata(MDs);
for (auto &MD : MDs)
CreateMetadataSlot(MD.second);
F.getAllMetadata(MDs);
for (auto &MD : MDs)
CreateMetadataSlot(MD.second);
for (auto &BB : F) {
for (auto &I : BB)
processInstructionMetadata(I);
}