mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2025-02-07 21:20:18 +00:00
Introduce a new array_pod_sort function and switch LSR to use it
instead of std::sort. This shrinks the release-asserts LSR.o file by 1100 bytes of code on my system. We should start using array_pod_sort where possible. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@60335 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
09fb7dadf1
commit
99d0015735
@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ inline tier<T1, T2> tie(T1& f, T2& s) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// Extra additions to arrays
|
||||
// Extra additions for arrays
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
/// Find where an array ends (for ending iterators)
|
||||
@ -221,6 +221,43 @@ inline size_t array_lengthof(T (&x)[N]) {
|
||||
return N;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// array_pod_sort_comparator - This is helper function for array_pod_sort,
|
||||
/// which does a memcmp of a specific size.
|
||||
template<unsigned Size>
|
||||
static inline int array_pod_sort_comparator(const void *P1, const void *P2) {
|
||||
if (Size == sizeof(char))
|
||||
return *(const char*)P1 - *(const char*)P2;
|
||||
if (Size == sizeof(int))
|
||||
return *(const int*)P1 - *(const int*)P2;
|
||||
if (Size == sizeof(long long))
|
||||
return *(const long long*)P1 - *(const long long*)P2;
|
||||
if (Size == sizeof(intptr_t))
|
||||
return *(intptr_t*)P1 - *(intptr_t*)P2;
|
||||
return memcmp(P1, P2, Size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// array_pod_sort - This sorts an array with the specified start and end
|
||||
/// extent. This is just like std::sort, except that it calls qsort instead of
|
||||
/// using an inlined template. qsort is slightly slower than std::sort, but
|
||||
/// most sorts are not performance critical in LLVM and std::sort has to be
|
||||
/// template instantiated for each type, leading to significant measured code
|
||||
/// bloat. This function should generally be used instead of std::sort where
|
||||
/// possible.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This function assumes that you have simple POD-like types that can be
|
||||
/// compared with memcmp and can be moved with memcpy. If this isn't true, you
|
||||
/// should use std::sort.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// NOTE: If qsort_r were portable, we could allow a custom comparator and
|
||||
/// default to std::less.
|
||||
template<class IteratorTy>
|
||||
static inline void array_pod_sort(IteratorTy Start, IteratorTy End) {
|
||||
// Don't dereference start iterator of empty sequence.
|
||||
if (Start == End) return;
|
||||
qsort(Start, End-Start, sizeof(*Start),
|
||||
array_pod_sort_comparator<sizeof(*Start)>);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} // End llvm namespace
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ void LoopStrengthReduce::DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() {
|
||||
// Sort the deadinsts list so that we can trivially eliminate duplicates as we
|
||||
// go. The code below never adds a non-dead instruction to the worklist, but
|
||||
// callers may not be so careful.
|
||||
std::sort(DeadInsts.begin(), DeadInsts.end());
|
||||
array_pod_sort(DeadInsts.begin(), DeadInsts.end());
|
||||
|
||||
// Drop duplicate instructions and those with uses.
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = DeadInsts.size()-1; i < e; ++i) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user