mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2025-01-31 17:42:40 +00:00
GVN: don't try to replace instruction with itself.
After some look-ahead PRE was added for GEPs, an instruction could end up in the table of candidates before it was actually inspected. When this happened the pass might decide it was the best candidate to replace itself. This didn't go well. Should fix PR25291 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251145 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
89cb1b78f9
commit
bd7189d76c
@ -2387,17 +2387,21 @@ bool GVN::processInstruction(Instruction *I) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Perform fast-path value-number based elimination of values inherited from
|
||||
// dominators.
|
||||
Value *repl = findLeader(I->getParent(), Num);
|
||||
if (!repl) {
|
||||
Value *Repl = findLeader(I->getParent(), Num);
|
||||
if (!Repl) {
|
||||
// Failure, just remember this instance for future use.
|
||||
addToLeaderTable(Num, I, I->getParent());
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
} else if (Repl == I) {
|
||||
// If I was the result of a shortcut PRE, it might already be in the table
|
||||
// and the best replacement for itself. Nothing to do.
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Remove it!
|
||||
patchAndReplaceAllUsesWith(I, repl);
|
||||
if (MD && repl->getType()->getScalarType()->isPointerTy())
|
||||
MD->invalidateCachedPointerInfo(repl);
|
||||
patchAndReplaceAllUsesWith(I, Repl);
|
||||
if (MD && Repl->getType()->getScalarType()->isPointerTy())
|
||||
MD->invalidateCachedPointerInfo(Repl);
|
||||
markInstructionForDeletion(I);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -47,3 +47,34 @@ return: ; preds = %sw.default, %sw.bb2
|
||||
%retval.0 = phi double [ 0.000000e+00, %sw.default ], [ %sub6, %sw.bb2 ], [ %sub, %if.then ]
|
||||
ret double %retval.0
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; The load causes the GEP's operands to be PREd earlier than normal. The
|
||||
; resulting sext ends up in pre.dest and in the GVN system before that BB is
|
||||
; actually processed. Make sure we can deal with the situation.
|
||||
|
||||
define void @test_shortcut_safe(i1 %tst, i32 %p1, i32* %a) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test_shortcut_safe
|
||||
; CHECK: [[SEXT1:%.*]] = sext i32 %p1 to i64
|
||||
; CHECK: [[PHI1:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[SEXT1]], {{%.*}} ], [ [[PHI2:%.*]], {{%.*}} ]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[SEXT2:%.*]] = sext i32 %p1 to i64
|
||||
; CHECK: [[PHI2]] = phi i64 [ [[SEXT2]], {{.*}} ], [ [[PHI1]], {{%.*}} ]
|
||||
; CHECK: getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 [[PHI2]]
|
||||
|
||||
br i1 %tst, label %sext1, label %pre.dest
|
||||
|
||||
pre.dest:
|
||||
br label %sext.use
|
||||
|
||||
sext1:
|
||||
%idxprom = sext i32 %p1 to i64
|
||||
br label %sext.use
|
||||
|
||||
sext.use:
|
||||
%idxprom2 = sext i32 %p1 to i64
|
||||
%arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 %idxprom2
|
||||
%val = load i32, i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
|
||||
tail call void (i32) @g(i32 %val)
|
||||
br label %pre.dest
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
declare void @g(i32)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user