Fix a bug where we would not promote calls to invokes if they occured in

the same block as the setjmp.  Thanks to Greg Pettyjohn for noticing this!


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@21403 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2005-04-21 16:46:46 +00:00
parent 3468e57f64
commit cb2d1a2dc2

View File

@ -238,8 +238,7 @@ bool LowerSetJmp::doInitialization(Module& M)
// "llvm.{setjmp,longjmp}" functions and none of the setjmp/longjmp error
// handling functions (beginning with __llvm_sjljeh_...they don't throw
// exceptions).
bool LowerSetJmp::IsTransformableFunction(const std::string& Name)
{
bool LowerSetJmp::IsTransformableFunction(const std::string& Name) {
std::string SJLJEh("__llvm_sjljeh");
if (Name.size() > SJLJEh.size())
@ -407,7 +406,10 @@ void LowerSetJmp::TransformSetJmpCall(CallInst* Inst)
BasicBlock* SetJmpContBlock = ABlock->splitBasicBlock(Inst);
assert(SetJmpContBlock && "Couldn't split setjmp BB!!");
SetJmpContBlock->setName("SetJmpContBlock");
SetJmpContBlock->setName(ABlock->getName()+"SetJmpCont");
// Add the SetJmpContBlock to the set of blocks reachable from a setjmp.
DFSBlocks.insert(SetJmpContBlock);
// This PHI node will be in the new block created from the
// splitBasicBlock call.