mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2024-11-26 21:20:37 +00:00
Reapply r131605. This time with a fix, which is to use NoFolder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131673 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3bff99f0a
commit
d3a1788da1
@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/ConstantRange.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/IRBuilder.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/NoFolder.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
||||
#include <algorithm>
|
||||
#include <set>
|
||||
@ -908,6 +909,7 @@ HoistTerminator:
|
||||
NT->takeName(I1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(NT);
|
||||
// Hoisting one of the terminators from our successor is a great thing.
|
||||
// Unfortunately, the successors of the if/else blocks may have PHI nodes in
|
||||
// them. If they do, all PHI entries for BB1/BB2 must agree for all PHI
|
||||
@ -924,11 +926,11 @@ HoistTerminator:
|
||||
// These values do not agree. Insert a select instruction before NT
|
||||
// that determines the right value.
|
||||
SelectInst *&SI = InsertedSelects[std::make_pair(BB1V, BB2V)];
|
||||
if (SI == 0) {
|
||||
SI = SelectInst::Create(BI->getCondition(), BB1V, BB2V,
|
||||
BB1V->getName()+"."+BB2V->getName(), NT);
|
||||
SI->setDebugLoc(BI->getDebugLoc());
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (SI == 0)
|
||||
SI = cast<SelectInst>
|
||||
(Builder.CreateSelect(BI->getCondition(), BB1V, BB2V,
|
||||
BB1V->getName()+"."+BB2V->getName()));
|
||||
|
||||
// Make the PHI node use the select for all incoming values for BB1/BB2
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
|
||||
if (PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == BB1 || PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == BB2)
|
||||
@ -1086,14 +1088,16 @@ static bool SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *BB1) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a select whose true value is the speculatively executed value and
|
||||
// false value is the previously determined FalseV.
|
||||
IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(BI);
|
||||
SelectInst *SI;
|
||||
if (Invert)
|
||||
SI = SelectInst::Create(BrCond, FalseV, HInst,
|
||||
FalseV->getName() + "." + HInst->getName(), BI);
|
||||
SI = cast<SelectInst>
|
||||
(Builder.CreateSelect(BrCond, FalseV, HInst,
|
||||
FalseV->getName() + "." + HInst->getName()));
|
||||
else
|
||||
SI = SelectInst::Create(BrCond, HInst, FalseV,
|
||||
HInst->getName() + "." + FalseV->getName(), BI);
|
||||
SI->setDebugLoc(BI->getDebugLoc());
|
||||
SI = cast<SelectInst>
|
||||
(Builder.CreateSelect(BrCond, HInst, FalseV,
|
||||
HInst->getName() + "." + FalseV->getName()));
|
||||
|
||||
// Make the PHI node use the select for all incoming values for "then" and
|
||||
// "if" blocks.
|
||||
@ -1232,8 +1236,7 @@ static bool FoldCondBranchOnPHI(BranchInst *BI, const TargetData *TD) {
|
||||
|
||||
/// FoldTwoEntryPHINode - Given a BB that starts with the specified two-entry
|
||||
/// PHI node, see if we can eliminate it.
|
||||
static bool FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PHINode *PN, const TargetData *TD,
|
||||
IRBuilder<> &Builder) {
|
||||
static bool FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PHINode *PN, const TargetData *TD) {
|
||||
// Ok, this is a two entry PHI node. Check to see if this is a simple "if
|
||||
// statement", which has a very simple dominance structure. Basically, we
|
||||
// are trying to find the condition that is being branched on, which
|
||||
@ -1332,7 +1335,7 @@ static bool FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PHINode *PN, const TargetData *TD,
|
||||
// If we can still promote the PHI nodes after this gauntlet of tests,
|
||||
// do all of the PHI's now.
|
||||
Instruction *InsertPt = DomBlock->getTerminator();
|
||||
Builder.SetInsertPoint(InsertPt);
|
||||
IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(InsertPt);
|
||||
|
||||
// Move all 'aggressive' instructions, which are defined in the
|
||||
// conditional parts of the if's up to the dominating block.
|
||||
@ -1460,6 +1463,7 @@ static bool SimplifyCondBranchToTwoReturns(BranchInst *BI,
|
||||
/// the predecessor and use logical operations to pick the right destination.
|
||||
bool llvm::FoldBranchToCommonDest(BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = BI->getParent();
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction *Cond = dyn_cast<Instruction>(BI->getCondition());
|
||||
if (Cond == 0 || (!isa<CmpInst>(Cond) && !isa<BinaryOperator>(Cond)) ||
|
||||
Cond->getParent() != BB || !Cond->hasOneUse())
|
||||
@ -1580,7 +1584,8 @@ bool llvm::FoldBranchToCommonDest(BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "FOLDING BRANCH TO COMMON DEST:\n" << *PBI << *BB);
|
||||
|
||||
IRBuilder<> Builder(PBI);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we need to invert the condition in the pred block to match, do so now.
|
||||
if (InvertPredCond) {
|
||||
Value *NewCond = PBI->getCondition();
|
||||
@ -1589,8 +1594,8 @@ bool llvm::FoldBranchToCommonDest(BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
CmpInst *CI = cast<CmpInst>(NewCond);
|
||||
CI->setPredicate(CI->getInversePredicate());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
NewCond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(NewCond,
|
||||
PBI->getCondition()->getName()+".not", PBI);
|
||||
NewCond = Builder.CreateNot(NewCond,
|
||||
PBI->getCondition()->getName()+".not");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
PBI->setCondition(NewCond);
|
||||
@ -1617,9 +1622,9 @@ bool llvm::FoldBranchToCommonDest(BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
New->takeName(Cond);
|
||||
Cond->setName(New->getName()+".old");
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction *NewCond = BinaryOperator::Create(Opc, PBI->getCondition(),
|
||||
New, "or.cond", PBI);
|
||||
NewCond->setDebugLoc(PBI->getDebugLoc());
|
||||
Instruction *NewCond =
|
||||
cast<Instruction>(Builder.CreateBinOp(Opc, PBI->getCondition(),
|
||||
New, "or.cond"));
|
||||
PBI->setCondition(NewCond);
|
||||
if (PBI->getSuccessor(0) == BB) {
|
||||
AddPredecessorToBlock(TrueDest, PredBlock, BB);
|
||||
@ -1762,23 +1767,22 @@ static bool SimplifyCondBranchToCondBranch(BranchInst *PBI, BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << *PBI->getParent()->getParent());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// BI may have other predecessors. Because of this, we leave
|
||||
// it alone, but modify PBI.
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure we get to CommonDest on True&True directions.
|
||||
Value *PBICond = PBI->getCondition();
|
||||
IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(PBI);
|
||||
if (PBIOp)
|
||||
PBICond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(PBICond,
|
||||
PBICond->getName()+".not",
|
||||
PBI);
|
||||
PBICond = Builder.CreateNot(PBICond, PBICond->getName()+".not");
|
||||
|
||||
Value *BICond = BI->getCondition();
|
||||
if (BIOp)
|
||||
BICond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(BICond,
|
||||
BICond->getName()+".not",
|
||||
PBI);
|
||||
BICond = Builder.CreateNot(BICond, BICond->getName()+".not");
|
||||
|
||||
// Merge the conditions.
|
||||
Value *Cond = BinaryOperator::CreateOr(PBICond, BICond, "brmerge", PBI);
|
||||
Value *Cond = Builder.CreateOr(PBICond, BICond, "brmerge");
|
||||
|
||||
// Modify PBI to branch on the new condition to the new dests.
|
||||
PBI->setCondition(Cond);
|
||||
@ -1801,8 +1805,8 @@ static bool SimplifyCondBranchToCondBranch(BranchInst *PBI, BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
Value *PBIV = PN->getIncomingValue(PBBIdx);
|
||||
if (BIV != PBIV) {
|
||||
// Insert a select in PBI to pick the right value.
|
||||
Value *NV = SelectInst::Create(PBICond, PBIV, BIV,
|
||||
PBIV->getName()+".mux", PBI);
|
||||
Value *NV = cast<SelectInst>
|
||||
(Builder.CreateSelect(PBICond, PBIV, BIV, PBIV->getName()+".mux"));
|
||||
PN->setIncomingValue(PBBIdx, NV);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2665,7 +2669,7 @@ bool SimplifyCFGOpt::run(BasicBlock *BB) {
|
||||
// eliminate it, do so now.
|
||||
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BB->begin()))
|
||||
if (PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2)
|
||||
Changed |= FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PN, TD, Builder);
|
||||
Changed |= FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PN, TD);
|
||||
|
||||
Builder.SetInsertPoint(BB->getTerminator());
|
||||
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user