It's O(N^2) because it does a simple walk through the existing types to
find duplicates, but that will be fixed in a follow-up commit to use a
mapping data structure of some kind.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@255482 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This probably shouldn't be generated in the .dwo file for CUs, only for
TUs, but it's in the sample .dwos (generated by clang) so dwp should
reflect that.
Arguably the DWP tool could be smart enough to know that the CUs
shouldn't need a debug_line.dwo section and skip that even when it's
legitimately generated for TUs, but that's a bit more off-book.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@254767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is very rudimentary support for debug_cu_index, but it is enough to
allow llvm-dwarfdump to find the offsets for contributions and
correctly dump debug_info.
It will need to actually find the real signature of the unit and build
the real hash table with the right number of buckets, as per the DWP
specification.
It will also need to be expanded to cover the tu_index as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@254489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also, ensure that references to those strings in debug_str_offsets.dwo
correctly refer to the deduplicated strings.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@254441 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This doesn't deduplicate strings in the debug_str section, nor does it
properly wire up the index so that debug_info can /find/ these strings,
but it does correct the str_offsets specifically.
Follow up patches to address those related/next issues.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@254431 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This just concatenates the common DWP sections without doing any of the
fancy DWP things like:
1) update str_offsets
2) deduplicating strings
3) merging/creating cu/tu_index
Patches for these will follow shortly.
(also not sure about target triple/object file type for this tool - do I
really need a whole triple just to write an object file that contains
purely static/hardcoded bytes in each section? & I guess I should just
pick it based on the first input, maybe, rather than hardcoding for now
- but we only produce .dwo on ELF platforms with objcopy for now anyway)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@254355 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
