This seems to match what gcc does for ppc and what every other llvm
backend does.
This is a fixed version of r209638. The difference is to avoid any change
in behavior for functions. The logic for using constant pools for function
addresseses is spread over a few places and we have to keep them in sync.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
field represents ELF section header sh_info field and does not have any
sense for regular sections. Its interpretation depends on section type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
During loop-unroll, loop exits from the current loop may end up in in different
outer loop. This requires to re-form LCSSA recursively for one level down from
the outer most loop where loop exits are landed during unroll. This fixes PR18861.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D2976
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209796 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
An address only use of an extract element of a load can be simplified to a
load. Without this the result of the extract element is spilled to the
stack so that an address is available.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Don't assume that dynamically initialized globals are all initialized from
_GLOBAL__<module_name>I_ function. Instead, scan the llvm.global_ctors and
insert poison/unpoison calls to each function there.
Patch by Nico Weber!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r209762, bringing back r209746. It was not responsible for the libc++ build failure
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209776 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r209746.
It looks it is causing a crash while building libcxx. I am trying to get a
reduced testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209762 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This matches gcc's behavior. It also seems natural given that aliases
contain other properties that govern how it is accessed (linkage,
visibility, dll storage).
Clang still has to be updated to expose this feature to C.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209759 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently LLVM will generally merge GEPs. This allows backends to use more
complex addressing modes. In some cases this is not happening because there
is PHI inbetween the two GEPs:
GEP1--\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3
GEP2--/
This patch checks to see if GEP1 and GEP2 are similiar enough that they can be
cloned (GEP12) in GEP3's BB, allowing GEP->GEP merging (GEP123):
GEP1--\ --\ --\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3 ==> |-->PHI2->GEP12->GEP3 == > |-->PHI2->GEP123
GEP2--/ --/ --/
This also breaks certain use chains that are preventing GEP->GEP merges that the
the existing instcombine would merge otherwise.
Tests included.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts r208640 (I've just XFAILed the test) because it broke ppc64/Linux
self-hosting. Because nearly every regression test triggers a segfault, I hope
this will be easy to fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements two things:
1. If we know one number is positive and another is negative, we return true as
signed addition of two opposite signed numbers will never overflow.
2. Implemented TODO : If one of the operands only has one non-zero bit, and if
the other operand has a known-zero bit in a more significant place than it
(not including the sign bit) the ripple may go up to and fill the zero, but
won't change the sign. e.x - (x & ~4) + 1
We make sure that we are ignoring 0 at MSB.
Patch by Suyog Sarda.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r209638 because it broke self-hosting on ppc64/Linux. (the
Clang-compiled TableGen would segfault because it jumped to an invalid address
from within _ZNK4llvm17ManagedStaticBase21RegisterManagedStaticEPFPvvEPFvS1_E
(which is within the command-line parameter registration process)).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add regression tests for the following transformation:
str X, [x20]
...
add x20, x20, #32
->
str X, [x20], #32
with X being either w0, x0, s0, d0 or q0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209715 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add regression tests for the following transformation:
ldr X, [x20]
...
add x20, x20, #32
->
ldr X, [x20], #32
with X being either w0, x0, s0, d0 or q0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209711 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The delinearization is needed only to remove the non linearity induced by
expressions involving multiplications of parameters and induction variables.
There is no problem in dealing with constant times parameters, or constant times
an induction variable.
For this reason, the current patch discards all constant terms and multipliers
before running the delinearization algorithm on the terms. The only thing
remaining in the term expressions are parameters and multiply expressions of
parameters: these simplified term expressions are passed to the array shape
recognizer that will not recognize constant dimensions anymore: these will be
recognized as different strides in parametric subscripts.
The only important special case of a constant dimension is the size of elements.
Instead of relying on the delinearization to infer the size of an element,
compute the element size from the base address type. This is a much more precise
way of computing the element size than before, as we would have mixed together
the size of an element with the strides of the innermost dimension.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209691 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
%higher and %highest can have non-zero values only for offsets greater
than 2GB, which is highly unlikely, if not impossible when compiling a
single function. This makes long branch for MIPS64 3 instructions smaller.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3281.diff
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209678 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After much puppetry, here's the major piece of the work to ensure that
even when a concrete definition preceeds all inline definitions, an
abstract definition is still created and referenced from both concrete
and inline definitions.
Variables are still broken in this case (see comment in
dbg-value-inlined-parameter.ll test case) and will be addressed in
follow up work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A further step to correctly emitting concrete out of line definitions
preceeding inlined instances of the same program.
To do this, emission of subprograms must be delayed until required since
we don't know which (abstract only (if there's no out of line
definition), concrete only (if there are no inlined instances), or both)
DIEs are required at the start of the module.
To reduce the test churn in the following commit that actually fixes the
bug, this commit introduces the lazy DIE construction and cleans up test
cases that are impacted by the changes in the resulting DIE ordering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209675 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a precursor to fixing inlined debug info where the concrete,
out-of-line definition may preceed any inlined usage. To cope with this,
the attributes that may appear on the concrete definition or the
abstract definition are delayed until the end of the module. Then, if an
abstract definition was created, it is referenced (and no other
attributes are added to the out-of-line definition), otherwise the
attributes are added directly to the out-of-line definition.
In a couple of cases this causes not just reordering of attributes, but
reordering of types. When the creation of the attribute is delayed, if
that creation would create a type (such as for a DW_AT_type attribute)
then other top level DIEs may've been constructed during the delay,
causing the referenced type to be created and added after those
intervening DIEs. In the extreme case, in cross-cu-inlining.ll, this
actually causes the DW_TAG_basic_type for "int" to move from one CU to
another.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209674 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is an enhancement to SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP. With this patch, we can
extract a constant offset from "s/zext and/or/xor A, B".
Added a new test @ext_or to verify this enhancement.
Refactoring the code, I also extracted some common logic to function
Distributable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209670 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This old test didn't have the argument numbering that's now squirelled
away in the high bits of the line number in the DW_TAG_arg_variable
metadata.
Add the numbering and update the test to ensure arguments are in-order.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209669 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Detected by Daniel Jasper, Ilia Filippov, and Andrea Di Biagio
Fixed the argument order to select (the mask semantics to blendv* are the
inverse of select) and fixed the tests
Added parenthesis to the assert condition
Ran clang-format
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209667 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In PPCISelLowering.cpp: PPCTargetLowering::LowerBUILD_VECTOR(), there
is an optimization for certain patterns to generate one or two vector
splats followed by a vector add or subtract. This operation is
represented by a VADD_SPLAT in the selection DAG. Prior to this
patch, it was possible for the VADD_SPLAT to be assigned the wrong
data type, causing incorrect code generation. This patch corrects the
problem.
Specifically, the code previously assigned the value type of the
BUILD_VECTOR node to the newly generated VADD_SPLAT node. This is
correct much of the time, but not always. The problem is that the
call to isConstantSplat() may return a SplatBitSize that is not the
same as the number of bits in the original element vector type. The
correct type to assign is a vector type with the same element bit size
as SplatBitSize.
The included test case shows an example of this, where the
BUILD_VECTOR node has a type of v16i8. The vector to be built is {0,
16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16}. isConstantSplat
detects that we can generate a splat of 16 for type v8i16, which is
the type we must assign to the VADD_SPLAT node. If we do not, we
generate a vspltisb of 8 and a vaddubm, which generates the incorrect
result {16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16,
16}. The correct code generation is a vspltish of 8 and a vadduhm.
This patch also corrected code generation for
CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-07-10-SplatMiscompile.ll, which had been marked
as an XFAIL, so we can remove the XFAIL from the test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Cortex-M4 only has single-precision floating point support, so any LLVM
"double" type will have been split into 2 i32s by now. Fortunately, the
consecutive-register framework turns out to be precisely what's needed to
reconstruct the double and follow AAPCS-VFP correctly!
rdar://problem/17012966
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Implemented an InstCombine transformation that takes a blendv* intrinsic
call and translates it into an IR select, if the mask is constant.
This will eventually get lowered into blends with immediates if possible,
or pblendvb (with an option to further optimize if we can transform the
pblendvb into a blend+immediate instruction, depending on the selector).
It will also enable optimizations by the IR passes, which give up on
sight of the intrinsic.
Both the transformation and the lowering of its result to asm got shiny
new tests.
The transformation is a bit convoluted because of blendvp[sd]'s
definition:
Its mask is a floating point value! This forces us to convert it and get
the highest bit. I suppose this happened because the mask has type
__m128 in Intel's intrinsic and v4sf (for blendps) in gcc's builtin.
I will send an email to llvm-dev to discuss if we want to change this or
not.
Reviewers: grosbach, delena, nadav
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3859
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is debatable. There are two possible approaches, neither
of which is really satisfactory:
1. Use "@foo(i1 zeroext)" to mean an extension to 32-bits on Darwin,
and 8 bits otherwise.
2. Redefine "@foo(i1)" to mean that the i1 is extended by the caller
to 8 bits. This goes against the spirit of "zeroext" I think, but
it's a bit of a vague construct anyway (by definition you're going
to extend to the amount required by the ABI, that's why it's the
ABI!).
This implements option 2. The DAG machinery really isn't setup for the
first (there's a fairly strong assumption that "zeroext" goes to at
least the smallest register size), and even if it was the resulting
DAG looks like it would be inferior in many cases.
Theoretically we could add AssertZext nodes in the consumers of
ABI-passed values too now, but this actually seems to make the code
worse in practice by making truncation proceed in two steps. The code
produced is equally valid if we continue to assume only the low bit is
defined.
Should fix PR19850
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209637 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can eliminate the custom C++ code in favour of some TableGen to
check the same things. Functionality should be identical, except for a
buffer overrun that was present in the C++ code and meant webkit
failed if any small argument needed to be passed on the stack.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have a couple of regression tests for load/store pairing, but (to my knowledge) there are no regression tests for the load/store + add/sub folding.
As a first step towards increased test coverage of this area, this commit adds a test for one instance of a load + add to pre-indexed load transformation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
