Our copy constructor doesn't explicitly invoke the base class's
constructor, and GCC is (rightly) concerned.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291023 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
This recommits 291006, reverted in r291007.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Breaks Clang's use of bitcode. Reverting until I have a fix to go with
it there.
This reverts commit r291006.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291007 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291006 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This just removes the usage of llvm::reverse and llvm::seq. That makes
it harder to handle the empty case correctly and so I've also added
a test there.
This is just a shot in the dark at what might be behind the buildbot
failures. I can't reproduce any issues locally including with ASan...
I feel like I'm missing something...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290954 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is both convenient and more efficient as we can skip any
intermediate reallocation of the vector.
This usage pattern came up in a subsequent patch on the pass manager,
but it seems generically useful so I factored it out and added unittests
here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This test was testing that we could correctly find the parent of a DIE, but it was actually just testing the special case where a DIE's depth was 1. This corrects that error by adding an extra level into the the DWARF to ensure that we correctly get the parent by looking for the parent with a depth that is 1 less than the current depth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28261
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm not sure if this was intentional, but today
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns true for readonly and
argmemonly calls that may throw. This commit changes the function to
not implicitly infer nounwind this way.
Even if we eventually specify readonly calls as not throwing,
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is not the best place to
infer that. We should instead teach FunctionAttrs or some other such
pass to tag readonly functions / calls as nounwind instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290794 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This class is unnecessary.
Its comment indicated that it was a compile error to allocate an
instance of a class that inherits from RefCountedBaseVPTR on the stack.
This may have been true at one point, but it's not today.
Moreover you really do not want to allocate *any* refcounted object on
the stack, vptrs or not, so if we did have a way to prevent these
objects from being stack-allocated, we'd want to apply it to regular
RefCountedBase too, obviating the need for a separate RefCountedBaseVPTR
class.
It seems that the main way RefCountedBaseVPTR provides safety is by
making its subclass's destructor virtual. This may have been helpful at
one point, but these days clang will emit an error if you define a class
with virtual functions that inherits from RefCountedBase but doesn't
have a virtual destructor.
Reviewers: compnerd, dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28162
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290717 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
analyses when we're about to break apart an SCC.
We can't wait until after breaking apart the SCC to invalidate things:
1) Which SCC do we then invalidate? All of them?
2) Even if we invalidate all of them, a newly created SCC may not have
a proxy that will convey the invalidation to functions!
Previously we only invalidated one of the SCCs and too late. This led to
stale analyses remaining in the cache. And because the caching strategy
actually works, they would get used and chaos would ensue.
Doing invalidation early is somewhat pessimizing though if we *know*
that the SCC structure won't change. So it turns out that the design to
make the mutation API force the caller to know the *kind* of mutation in
advance was indeed 100% correct and we didn't do enough of it. So this
change also splits two cases of switching a call edge to a ref edge into
two separate APIs so that callers can clearly test for this and take the
easy path without invalidating when appropriate. This is particularly
important in this case as we expect most inlines to be between functions
in separate SCCs and so the common case is that we don't have to so
aggressively invalidate analyses.
The LCG API change in turn needed some basic cleanups and better testing
in its unittest. No interesting functionality changed there other than
more coverage of the returned sequence of SCCs.
While this seems like an obvious improvement over the current state, I'd
like to revisit the core concept of invalidating within the CG-update
layer at all. I'm wondering if we would be better served forcing the
callers to handle the invalidation beforehand in the cases that they
can handle it. An interesting example is when we want to teach the
inliner to *update and preserve* analyses. But we can cross that bridge
when we get there.
With this patch, the new pass manager an build all of the LLVM test
suite at -O3 and everything passes. =D I haven't bootstrapped yet and
I'm sure there are still plenty of bugs, but this gives a nice baseline
so I'm going to increasingly focus on fleshing out the missing
functionality, especially the bits that are just turned off right now in
order to let us establish this baseline.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290664 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
due to a call cycle.
This actually crashed the ref removal before.
I've added a unittest that covers this kind of interesting graph
structure and mutation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290645 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix a warning detected by gcc 6:
warning: cast from type 'const void*' to type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that require deferred invalidation.
This handles the other real-world invalidation scenario that we have
cases of: a function analysis which caches references to a module
analysis. We currently do this in the AA aggregation layer and might
well do this in other places as well.
Since this is relative rare, the technique is somewhat more cumbersome.
Analyses need to register themselves when accessing the outer analysis
manager's proxy. This proxy is already necessarily present to allow
access to the outer IR unit's analyses. By registering here we can track
and trigger invalidation when that outer analysis goes away.
To make this work we need to enhance the PreservedAnalyses
infrastructure to support a (slightly) more explicit model for "sets" of
analyses, and allow abandoning a single specific analyses even when
a set covering that analysis is preserved. That allows us to describe
the scenario of preserving all Function analyses *except* for the one
where deferred invalidation has triggered.
We also need to teach the invalidator API to support direct ID calls
instead of always going through a template to dispatch so that we can
just record the ID mapping.
I've introduced testing of all of this both for simple module<->function
cases as well as for more complex cases involving a CGSCC layer.
Much like the previous patch I've not tried to fully update the loop
pass management layer because that layer is due to be heavily reworked
to use similar techniques to the CGSCC to handle updates. As that
happens, we'll have a better testing basis for adding support like this.
Many thanks to both Justin and Sean for the extensive reviews on this to
help bring the API design and documentation into a better state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27198
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290594 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
constant expression and to correctly form function reference edges
through them without crashing because one of the operands (the
`BasicBlock` isn't actually a constant despite being an operand of
a constant).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This recommits r290512 that was reverted when MSVC failed to compile it. Since
then I've played with various approaches using rextester.com (where I was able
to reproduce the failure) and think that I have a solution thanks in part to
the help of Dave Blaikie! It seems MSVC just has a defective `decltype` in this
version. Manually writing out the type seems to do the trick, even though it is
.... quite complicated.
Original commit message:
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
multiple asynchronous RPC calls.
ParallelCallGroup allows multiple asynchronous calls to be dispatched,
and provides a wait method that blocks until all asynchronous calls have
been executed on the remote and all return value handlers run on the
local machine.
This will allow, for example, the JIT client to issue memory allocation calls
for all sections in parallel, then block until all memory has been allocated
on the remote and the allocated addresses registered with the client, at which
point the JIT client can proceed to applying relocations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290523 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This code doesn't work on MSVC for reasons that elude me and I've not
yet covinced a workaround to compile cleanly so reverting for now while
I play with it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290513 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290512 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes some ASAN unittest failures on FreeBSD. See the
cfe-commits email thread for r290169 for more on those.
According to the LangRef, the allocsize attribute only tells us about
the number of bytes that exist at the memory location pointed to by the
return value of a function. It does not necessarily mean that the
function will only ever allocate. So, we need to be very careful about
treating functions with allocsize as general allocation functions. This
patch makes us fully conservative in this regard, though I suspect that
we have room to be a bit more aggressive if we want.
This has a FIXME that can be fixed by a relatively straightforward
refactor; I just wanted to keep this patch minimal. If this sticks, I'll
come back and fix it in a few days.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290397 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
from the old pass manager in the new one.
I'm not trying to support (initially) the numerous options that are
currently available to customize the pass pipeline. If we end up really
wanting them, we can add them later, but I suspect many are no longer
interesting. The simplicity of omitting them will help a lot as we sort
out what the pipeline should look like in the new PM.
I've also documented to the best of my ability *why* each pass or group
of passes is used so that reading the pipeline is more helpful. In many
cases I think we have some questionable choices of ordering and I've
left FIXME comments in place so we know what to come back and revisit
going forward. But for now, I've left it as similar to the current
pipeline as I could.
Lastly, I've had to comment out several places where passes are not
ported to the new pass manager or where the loop pass infrastructure is
not yet ready. I did at least fix a few bugs in the loop pass
infrastructure uncovered by running the full pipeline, but I didn't want
to go too far in this patch -- I'll come back and re-enable these as the
infrastructure comes online. But I'd like to keep the comments in place
because I don't want to lose track of which passes need to be enabled
and where they go.
One thing that seemed like a significant API improvement was to require
that we don't build pipelines for O0. It seems to have no real benefit.
I've also switched back to returning pass managers by value as at this
API layer it feels much more natural to me for composition. But if
others disagree, I'm happy to go back to an output parameter.
I'm not 100% happy with the testing strategy currently, but it seems at
least OK. I may come back and try to refactor or otherwise improve this
in subsequent patches but I wanted to at least get a good starting point
in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28042
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In order for the llvm DWARF parser to be used in LLDB we will need to be able to get the parent of a DIE. This patch adds that functionality by changing the DWARFDebugInfoEntry class to store a depth field instead of a sibling index. Using a depth field allows us to easily calculate the sibling and the parent without increasing the size of DWARFDebugInfoEntry.
I tested llvm-dsymutil on a debug version of clang where this fully parses DWARF in over 1200 .o files to verify there was no serious regression in performance.
Added a full suite of unit tests to test this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27995
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290274 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GlobPattern is a class to handle glob pattern matching. Currently
only LLD is using that, but technically that feature is not specific
to linkers, so in this patch I move that file to LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27969
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DWARF 4 and later supports encoding the PC as an address or as as offset from the low PC. Clients using DWARFDie should be insulated from how to extract the high PC value. This function takes care of extracting the form value and looking for the correct form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27885
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
unittests/ADT/TwineTest.cpp:106:38: error: field 'Count' will be initialized after base 'llvm::FormatAdapter<int>' [-Werror,-Wreorder]
explicit formatter(int &Count) : Count(Count), FormatAdapter(0) {}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290029 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
BPI may trigger signed overflow UB while computing branch probabilities for
cold calls or to unreachables. For example, with our current choice of weights,
we'll crash if there are >= 2^12 branches to an unreachable.
Use a safer BranchProbability constructor which is better at handling fractions
with large denominators.
Changes since the initial commit:
- Use explicit casts to ensure that multiplication operands are 64-bit
ints.
rdar://problem/29368161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27862
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r290016. It breaks this bot, even though the test
passes locally:
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/32956/
AnalysisTests: /home/bb/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/BranchProbability.cpp:52: static llvm::BranchProbability llvm::BranchProbability::getBranchProbability(uint64_t, uint64_t): Assertion `Numerator <= Denominator && "Probability cannot be bigger than 1!"' failed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290019 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
BPI may trigger signed overflow UB while computing branch probabilities
for cold calls or to unreachables. For example, with our current choice
of weights, we'll crash if there are >= 2^12 branches to an unreachable.
Use a safer BranchProbability constructor which is better at handling
fractions with large denominators.
rdar://problem/29368161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27862
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289982 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289920 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This replaces the format member search, which was quite complicated, with a more
direct approach to detecting whether a class should be formatted using the
format-member method. Instead we use a special type llvm::format_adapter, which
every adapter must inherit from. Then the search can be simply implemented with
the is_base_of type trait.
Aside from the simplification, I like this way more because it makes it more
explicit that you are supposed to use this type only for adapter-like
formattings, and the other approach (format_provider overloads) should be used
as a default (a mistake I made when first trying to use this library).
The only slight change in behaviour here is that now choose the format-adapter
branch even if the format member invocation will fail to compile (e.g. because it is a
non-const member function and we are passing a const adapter), whereas
previously we would have gone on to search for format_providers for the type.
However, I think that is actually a good thing, as it probably means the
programmer did something wrong.
Reviewers: zturner, inglorion
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27679
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289795 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
