If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
This recommits 291006, reverted in r291007.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Breaks Clang's use of bitcode. Reverting until I have a fix to go with
it there.
This reverts commit r291006.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291007 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291006 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As per post-commit review for r289993 (D27775), we can only safely
import a type as a decl if it has an Identifier, as the Name alone
is not enough to be unique across modules.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290915 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Bitstream reader and writer are limited to handle a "size_t" at
most, which means that we can't backpatch and read back a 64bits
value on 32 bits platform.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290693 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This index record the position for each metadata record in
the bitcode, so that the reader will be able to lazy-load
on demand each individual record.
We also make sure that every abbrev is emitted upfront so
that the block can be skipped while reading.
I don't plan to commit this before having the reader
counterpart, but I figured this can be reviewed mostly
independently.
Recommit r290684 (was reverted in r290686 because a test
was broken) after adding a threshold to avoid emitting
the index when unnecessary (little amount of metadata).
This optimization "hides" a limitation of the ability
to backpatch in the bitstream: we can only backpatch
safely when the position has been flushed. So if we emit
an index for one metadata, it is possible that (part of)
the offset placeholder hasn't been flushed and the backpatch
will fail.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28083
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit a0ca6ae2d38339e4ede0dfa588086fc23d87e836. Revert at
Mehdi's request as it is breaking bots.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This index record the position for each metadata record in
the bitcode, so that the reader will be able to lazy-load
on demand each individual record.
We also make sure that every abbrev is emitted upfront so
that the block can be skipped while reading.
I don't plan to commit this before having the reader
counterpart, but I figured this can be reviewed mostly
independently.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28083
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290684 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes it explicit what is the exact list to handle, and it
looks much more easy to manipulate and understand that the
previous custom tracking of min/max to express the range where
to look for.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28089
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is pure code motion, will just make it more reusable when I'll
attempt to lazy-load Metadats on-demand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is to put the vector into a well defined state. Apparently the state of a
vector after being moved from is valid but unspecified. Found with clang-tidy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Each function summary has an attached list of type identifier GUIDs. The
idea is that during the regular LTO phase we would match these GUIDs to type
identifiers defined by the regular LTO module and store the resolutions in
a top-level "type identifier summary" (which will be implemented separately).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27967
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290280 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
When reading the metadata bitcode, create a type declaration when
possible for composite types when we are importing. Doing this in
the bitcode reader saves memory. Also it works naturally in the case
when the type ODR map contains a definition for the same composite type
because it was used in the importing module (buildODRType will
automatically use the existing definition and not create a type
declaration).
For Chromium built with -g2, this reduces the aggregate size of the
generated native object files by 66% (from 31G to 10G). It reduced
the time through the ThinLTO link and backend phases by about 20% on
my machine.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27775
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289993 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289982 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289920 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I'm planning on changing the way we load metadata to enable laziness.
I'm getting lost in this gigantic files, and gigantic class that is the bitcode
reader. This is a first toward splitting it in a few coarse components that
are more easily understandable.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27646
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289461 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Compiling with GCC 5 or later can fail with a bogus error "constructor
required before non-static data member for
llvm::ValueEnumerator::MDRange::First has been parsed".
This was originally fixed upstream in GCC PR 70528, but later this fix
was reverted, and released versions of GCC still show the bogus error.
To work around this, replace MDRange's declaration of a default
constructor with a definition.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, rsmith, rivanvx
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dim, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18730
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289454 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.
The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html
The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.
Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288683 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The assertions were wrong; we need to call getEncodingData() on the element,
not the array. While here, simplify the skipRecord() implementation for Fixed
and Char6 arrays. This is tested by the code I added to llvm-bcanalyzer
which makes sure that we can skip any record.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27241
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288315 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This interface allows clients to write multiple modules to a single
bitcode file. Also introduce the llvm-cat utility which can be used
to create a bitcode file containing multiple modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26179
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288195 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We now expect each module's identification block to appear immediately before
the module block. Any module block that appears without an identification block
immediately before it is interpreted as if it does not have a module block.
Also change the interpretation of VST and function offsets in bitcode.
The offset is always taken as relative to the start of the identification
(or module if not present) block, minus one word. This corresponds to the
historical interpretation of offsets, i.e. relative to the start of the file.
These changes allow for bitcode modules to be concatenated by copying bytes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27184
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288098 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch updates a bunch of places where add_dependencies was being explicitly called to add dependencies on intrinsics_gen to instead use the DEPENDS named parameter. This cleanup is needed for a patch I'm working on to add a dependency debugging mode to the build system.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@287206 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This restores the rest of r286297 (part was restored in r286475).
Specifically, it restores the part requiring adding a dependency from
the Analysis to Object library (downstream use changed to correctly
model split BitReader vs BitWriter libraries).
Original description of this part of patch follows:
Module level asm may also contain defs of values. We need to prevent
export of any refs to local values defined in module level asm (e.g. a
ref in normal IR), since that also requires renaming/promotion of the
local. To do that, the summary index builder looks at all values in the
module level asm string that are not marked Weak or Global, which is
exactly the set of locals that are defined. A summary is created for
each of these local defs and flagged as NoRename.
This required adding handling to the BitcodeWriter to look at GV
declarations to see if they have a summary (rather than skipping them
all).
Finally, added an assert to IRObjectFile::CollectAsmUndefinedRefs to
ensure that an MCAsmParser is available, otherwise the module asm parse
would silently fail. Initialized the asm parser in the opt tool for use
in testing this fix.
Fixes PR30610.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The change in r285513 to prevent exporting of locals used in
inline asm added all locals in the llvm.used set to the reference
set of functions containing inline asm. Since these locals were marked
NoRename, this automatically prevented importing of the function.
Unfortunately, this caused an explosion in the summary reference lists
in some cases. In my particular example, it happened for a large protocol
buffer generated C++ file, where many of the generated functions
contained an inline asm call. It was exacerbated when doing a ThinLTO
PGO instrumentation build, where the PGO instrumentation included
thousands of private __profd_* values that were added to llvm.used.
We really only need to include a single llvm.used local (NoRename) value
in the reference list of a function containing inline asm to block it
being imported. However, it seems cleaner to add a flag to the summary
that explicitly describes this situation, which is what this patch does.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26402
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286840 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds explicit `(void)` casts to discarded `release()` calls to suppress -Wunused-result.
This patch fixes *all* warnings are generated as a result of [applying `[[nodiscard]]` within libc++](https://reviews.llvm.org/D26596).
Similar fixes were applied to Clang in r286796.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26598
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The functions getBitcodeTargetTriple(), isBitcodeContainingObjCCategory(),
getBitcodeProducerString() and hasGlobalValueSummary() now return errors
via their return value rather than via the diagnostic handler.
To make this work, re-implement these functions using non-member functions
so that they can be used without the LLVMContext required by BitcodeReader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26532
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Split ReaderWriter.h which contains the APIs into both the BitReader and
BitWriter libraries into BitcodeReader.h and BitcodeWriter.h.
This is to address Chandler's concern about sharing the same API header
between multiple libraries (BitReader and BitWriter). That concern is
why we create a single bitcode library in our downstream build of clang,
which led to r286297 being reverted as it added a dependency that
created a cycle only when there is a single bitcode library (not two as
in upstream).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: dlj, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26502
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
