In loops that look something like
i = n;
do {
...
} while(i++ < n+k);
where k is a constant, the maximum backedge count is k (in fact the backedge
count will be either 0 or k, depending on whether n+k wraps). More generally
for LHS < RHS if RHS-(LHS of first comparison) is a constant then the loop will
iterate either 0 or that constant number of times.
This allows for more loop unrolling with the recent upper bound loop unrolling
changes, and I'm working on a patch that will let loop unrolling additionally
make use of the loop being executed either 0 or k times (we need to retain the
loop comparison only on the first unrolled iteration).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25607
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284465 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed on PR28461 we currently miss the chance to lower "fptosi <2 x double> %arg to <2 x i32>" to cvttpd2dq due to its use of illegal types.
This patch adds support for fptosi to 2i32 from both 2f64 and 2f32.
It also recognises that cvttpd2dq zeroes the upper 64-bits of the xmm result (similar to D23797) - we still don't do this for the cvttpd2dq/cvttps2dq intrinsics - this can be done in a future patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23808
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284459 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: The delinearization algorithm did not consider terms which had an extension without a multiply factor, i.e. a identify factor. We lose cases where size is char type where there will no multiply factor.
Reviewers: sanjoy, grosser
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, Eugene.Zelenko, llvm-commits, mssimpso, sanjoy, grosser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16492
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284378 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
While walking defs of pointer operands we were assuming that the pointer
size would remain constant. This is not true, because addresspacecast
instructions may cast the pointer to an address space with a different
pointer width.
This partial reverts r282612, which was a more conservative solution
to this problem.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, apilipenko
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@283557 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The computeKnownBits and ComputeNumSignBits functions in ValueTracking can now do a simple look-through of ExtractElement.
Reviewers: majnemer, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24955
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@283434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: When identifying cold blocks, consider only the edge to the normal destination if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide edge weights for the InvokeInst.
Reviewers: mcrosier, hfinkel, davidxl
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24868
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282262 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
value is a pointer.
This patch is to fix PR30213. When expanding an expr based on ValueOffsetPair,
if the value is of pointer type, we can only create a getelementptr instead
of sub expr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24088
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@281439 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixed a bug in run-time checks for possible memory conflicts inside loop.
The bug is in Low <-> High boundaries calculation. The High boundary should be calculated as "last memory access pointer + element size".
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23176
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279930 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when unroll runtime iteration loop.
In llvm::UnrollRuntimeLoopRemainder, if the loop to be unrolled is the inner
loop inside a loop nest, the scalar evolution needs to be dropped for its
parent loop which is done by ScalarEvolution::forgetLoop. However, we can
postpone forgetLoop to the end of UnrollRuntimeLoopRemainder so TripCountSC
expansion can still reuse existing value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23572
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Repeated inserts into AliasSetTracker have quadratic behavior - inserting a
pointer into AST is linear, since it requires walking over all "may" alias
sets and running an alias check vs. every pointer in the set.
We can avoid this by tracking the total number of pointers in "may" sets,
and when that number exceeds a threshold, declare the tracker "saturated".
This lumps all pointers into a single "may" set that aliases every other
pointer.
(This is a stop-gap solution until we migrate to MemorySSA)
This fixes PR28832.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23432
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279274 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is to fix the bug in PR28705. It was caused by setting wrong return
value for SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion. The return values of findExistingExpansion
have different meanings when the function is used in different ways so it is easy to make
mistake. The fix creates two new interfaces to replace SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion,
and specifies where each interface is expected to be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22942
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278161 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The fix for PR28705 will be committed consecutively.
In D12090, the ExprValueMap was added to reuse existing value during SCEV expansion.
However, const folding and sext/zext distribution can make the reuse still difficult.
A simplified case is: suppose we know S1 expands to V1 in ExprValueMap, and
S1 = S2 + C_a
S3 = S2 + C_b
where C_a and C_b are different SCEVConstants. Then we'd like to expand S3 as
V1 - C_a + C_b instead of expanding S2 literally. It is helpful when S2 is a
complex SCEV expr and S2 has no entry in ExprValueMap, which is usually caused
by the fact that S3 is generated from S1 after const folding.
In order to do that, we represent ExprValueMap as a mapping from SCEV to
ValueOffsetPair. We will save both S1->{V1, 0} and S2->{V1, C_a} into the
ExprValueMap when we create SCEV for V1. When S3 is expanded, it will first
expand S2 to V1 - C_a because of S2->{V1, C_a} in the map, then expand S3 to
V1 - C_a + C_b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Shifts with a uniform but non-constant count were considered very expensive to
vectorize, because the splat of the uniform count and the shift would tend to
appear in different blocks. That made the splat invisible to ISel, and we'd
scalarize the shift at codegen time.
Since r201655, CodeGenPrepare sinks those splats to be next to their use, and we
are able to select the appropriate vector shifts. This updates the cost model to
to take this into account by making shifts by a uniform cheap again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23049
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277782 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As it turns out, modref queries are broken with CFLAA. Specifically,
the data source we were using for determining modref behaviors
explicitly ignores operations on non-pointer values. So, it wouldn't
note e.g. storing an i32 to an i32* (or loading an i64 from an i64*).
It also ignores external function calls, rather than acting
conservatively for them.
(N.B. These operations, where necessary, *are* tracked by CFLAA; we just
use a different mechanism to do so. Said mechanism is relatively
imprecise, so it's unlikely that we can provide reasonably good modref
answers with it as implemented.)
Patch by Jia Chen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22978
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness
attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all
passes that emit optimization remarks. BFI depends on BPI so unless we
make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally.
The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute
BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client.
I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover
BPI.
Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change lets us prove things like
"{X,+,10} s< 5000" implies "{X+7,+,10} does not sign overflow"
It does this by replacing replacing getConstantDifference by
computeConstantDifference (which is smarter) in
isImpliedCondOperandsViaRanges.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@276505 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
