llvm/lib/Analysis
Sanjay Patel bc8114f733 CGSCC should not treat intrinsic calls like function calls (PR21403)
Make the handling of calls to intrinsics in CGSCC consistent: 
they are not treated like regular function calls because they
are never lowered to function calls.

Without this patch, we can get dangling pointer asserts from
the subsequent loop that processes callsites because it already
ignores intrinsics.

See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21403 for more details / discussion.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6124



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-12 18:25:47 +00:00
..
2014-11-03 23:19:16 +00:00
2014-05-15 01:52:21 +00:00
2014-11-11 21:30:22 +00:00
2014-11-11 21:30:22 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//