llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/prevent-cmp-merge.ll
David Majnemer e049aa6ae3 [InstCombine] Don't aggressively replace xor with icmp
For some cases, InstCombine replaces the sequence of xor/sub instruction
followed by cmp instruction into a single cmp instruction.

However, this replacement may result suboptimal result especially when
the xor/sub has more than one use, as discussed in
bug 26465 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26465).

This patch make the replacement happen only when xor/sub has only one
use.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16915

Patch by Taewook Oh!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@260695 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-02-12 18:12:38 +00:00

42 lines
1.1 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
;
; This test makes sure that InstCombine does not replace the sequence of
; xor/sub instruction followed by cmp instruction into a single cmp instruction
; if there is more than one use of xor/sub.
define zeroext i1 @test1(i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
; CHECK-NEXT: %xor = xor i32 %lhs, 5
; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 10
%xor = xor i32 %lhs, 5
%cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 10
%cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %xor, %rhs
%sel = or i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
ret i1 %sel
}
define zeroext i1 @test2(i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
; CHECK-NEXT: %xor = xor i32 %lhs, %rhs
; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 0
%xor = xor i32 %lhs, %rhs
%cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 0
%cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %xor, 32
%sel = xor i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
ret i1 %sel
}
define zeroext i1 @test3(i32 %lhs, i32 %rhs) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3(
; CHECK-NEXT: %sub = sub nsw i32 %lhs, %rhs
; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %sub, 0
%sub = sub nsw i32 %lhs, %rhs
%cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %sub, 0
%cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %sub, 31
%sel = or i1 %cmp1, %cmp2
ret i1 %sel
}