llvm/lib/Analysis
Sanjay Patel bac9c437ae [InstSimplify] fold negation of sign-bit
0 - X --> X, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value
0 - X --> 0, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value and the sub is NSW

I noticed this pattern might be created in the backend after the change from D25485, 
so we'll want to add a similar fold for the DAG.

The use of computeKnownBits in InstSimplify may be something to investigate if the
compile time of InstSimplify is noticeable. We could replace computeKnownBits with 
specific pattern matchers or limit the recursion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25785


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-10-19 21:23:45 +00:00
..
AliasAnalysis.cpp
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp
AliasAnalysisSummary.cpp
AliasAnalysisSummary.h
AliasSetTracker.cpp [AliasSetTracker] Add support for memcpy and memmove. 2016-10-19 19:09:03 +00:00
Analysis.cpp
AssumptionCache.cpp
BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp
BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp
BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp
CallGraph.cpp
CallGraphSCCPass.cpp
CallPrinter.cpp
CaptureTracking.cpp
CFG.cpp
CFGPrinter.cpp
CFLAndersAliasAnalysis.cpp
CFLGraph.h
CFLSteensAliasAnalysis.cpp
CGSCCPassManager.cpp
CMakeLists.txt
CodeMetrics.cpp
ConstantFolding.cpp
CostModel.cpp
Delinearization.cpp
DemandedBits.cpp
DependenceAnalysis.cpp
DivergenceAnalysis.cpp
DominanceFrontier.cpp
DomPrinter.cpp
EHPersonalities.cpp
GlobalsModRef.cpp
IndirectCallPromotionAnalysis.cpp
InlineCost.cpp
InstCount.cpp
InstructionSimplify.cpp [InstSimplify] fold negation of sign-bit 2016-10-19 21:23:45 +00:00
Interval.cpp
IntervalPartition.cpp
IteratedDominanceFrontier.cpp
IVUsers.cpp
LazyBlockFrequencyInfo.cpp
LazyBranchProbabilityInfo.cpp
LazyCallGraph.cpp
LazyValueInfo.cpp
Lint.cpp
LLVMBuild.txt
Loads.cpp
LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
LoopInfo.cpp
LoopPass.cpp
LoopPassManager.cpp
LoopUnrollAnalyzer.cpp
MemDepPrinter.cpp
MemDerefPrinter.cpp
MemoryBuiltins.cpp
MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
MemoryLocation.cpp
ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp
ModuleSummaryAnalysis.cpp
ObjCARCAliasAnalysis.cpp
ObjCARCAnalysisUtils.cpp
ObjCARCInstKind.cpp
OptimizationDiagnosticInfo.cpp
OrderedBasicBlock.cpp
PHITransAddr.cpp
PostDominators.cpp
ProfileSummaryInfo.cpp
PtrUseVisitor.cpp
README.txt
RegionInfo.cpp
RegionPass.cpp
RegionPrinter.cpp
ScalarEvolution.cpp [SCEV] Make CompareValueComplexity a little bit smarter 2016-10-18 17:45:16 +00:00
ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp
ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp
ScopedNoAliasAA.cpp
SparsePropagation.cpp
StratifiedSets.h
TargetLibraryInfo.cpp
TargetTransformInfo.cpp
Trace.cpp
TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp
TypeMetadataUtils.cpp
ValueTracking.cpp
VectorUtils.cpp

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//