mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2024-11-30 07:00:45 +00:00
2ff961f668
with a fix rotate CallInst operands, i.e. move callee to the back of the operand array the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits: more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction, smaller compiler binary git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101397 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| IPA | ||
| AliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp | ||
| AliasDebugger.cpp | ||
| AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
| Analysis.cpp | ||
| BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| CaptureTracking.cpp | ||
| CFGPrinter.cpp | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| ConstantFolding.cpp | ||
| DbgInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
| DebugInfo.cpp | ||
| DomPrinter.cpp | ||
| InlineCost.cpp | ||
| InstCount.cpp | ||
| InstructionSimplify.cpp | ||
| Interval.cpp | ||
| IntervalPartition.cpp | ||
| IVUsers.cpp | ||
| LazyValueInfo.cpp | ||
| LibCallAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| LibCallSemantics.cpp | ||
| Lint.cpp | ||
| LiveValues.cpp | ||
| LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| LoopInfo.cpp | ||
| LoopPass.cpp | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MemoryBuiltins.cpp | ||
| MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| PHITransAddr.cpp | ||
| PointerTracking.cpp | ||
| PostDominators.cpp | ||
| ProfileEstimatorPass.cpp | ||
| ProfileInfo.cpp | ||
| ProfileInfoLoader.cpp | ||
| ProfileInfoLoaderPass.cpp | ||
| ProfileVerifierPass.cpp | ||
| README.txt | ||
| ScalarEvolution.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp | ||
| SparsePropagation.cpp | ||
| Trace.cpp | ||
| ValueTracking.cpp | ||
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//