llvm/test/Verifier/dominates.ll
Michael Kruse 6fde9c2db6 [Verifier] Reject PHIs using defs from own block.
Reject the following IR as malformed (assuming that %entry, %next are
not in a loop):

    next:
      %y = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ]
      %x = phi i32 [ %y, %entry ]

Such PHI nodes came up in PR26718. While there was no consensus on
whether or not this is valid IR, most opinions on that bug and in a
discussion on the llvm-dev mailing list tended towards a
"strict interpretation" (term by Joseph Tremoulet) of PHI node uses.
Also, the language reference explicitly states that "the use of each
incoming value is deemed to occur on the edge from the corresponding
predecessor block to the current block" and
`DominatorTree::dominates(Instruction*, Use&)` uses this definition as
well.

For the code mentioned in PR15384, clang does not compile to such PHIs
(anymore?). The test case still hangs when replacing `%tmp6` with `%tmp`
in revisions before r176366 (where PR15384 has been fixed). The
occurrence of %tmp6 therefore was probably unintentional. Its value is
not used except in other PHIs.

Reviewers: majnemer, reames, JosephTremoulet, bkramer, grosser, jdoerfert, kparzysz, sanjoy

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18443

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@264528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-03-26 23:32:57 +00:00

71 lines
1.6 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: not llvm-as < %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
define i32 @f1(i32 %x) {
%y = add i32 %z, 1
%z = add i32 %x, 1
ret i32 %y
; CHECK: Instruction does not dominate all uses!
; CHECK-NEXT: %z = add i32 %x, 1
; CHECK-NEXT: %y = add i32 %z, 1
}
declare i32 @g()
define void @f2(i32 %x) personality i32 ()* @g {
bb0:
%y1 = invoke i32 @g() to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2
bb1:
ret void
bb2:
%y2 = phi i32 [%y1, %bb0]
%y3 = landingpad i32
cleanup
ret void
; CHECK: Instruction does not dominate all uses!
; CHECK-NEXT: %y1 = invoke i32 @g()
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2
; CHECK-NEXT: %y2 = phi i32 [ %y1, %bb0 ]
}
define void @f3(i32 %x) personality i32 ()* @g {
bb0:
%y1 = invoke i32 @g() to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2
bb1:
ret void
bb2:
%y2 = landingpad i32
cleanup
br label %bb3
bb3:
%y3 = phi i32 [%y1, %bb2]
ret void
; CHECK: Instruction does not dominate all uses!
; CHECK-NEXT: %y1 = invoke i32 @g()
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2
; CHECK-NEXT: %y3 = phi i32 [ %y1, %bb2 ]
}
define void @f4(i32 %x) {
bb0:
br label %bb1
bb1:
%y3 = phi i32 [%y1, %bb0]
%y1 = add i32 %x, 1
ret void
; CHECK: Instruction does not dominate all uses!
; CHECK-NEXT: %y1 = add i32 %x, 1
; CHECK-NEXT: %y3 = phi i32 [ %y1, %bb0 ]
}
define void @f5() {
entry:
br label %next
next:
%y = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ]
%x = phi i32 [ %y, %entry ]
ret void
; CHECK: Instruction does not dominate all uses!
; CHECK-NEXT: %y = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ]
; CHECK-NEXT: %x = phi i32 [ %y, %entry ]
}