mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2024-12-22 20:18:38 +00:00
e9106e2cd2
If dominator tree is not calculated or is invalidated, set corresponding pointer in the pass state to nullptr. Such pointer value will indicate that operations with dominator tree are not allowed. In particular, it allows to skip verification for such pass state. The dominator tree is not calculated if the machine dominator pass was skipped, it occures in the case of entities with linkage available_externally. The change fixes some test fails observed when expensive checks are enabled. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29280 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
158 lines
5.0 KiB
C++
158 lines
5.0 KiB
C++
//===- MachineDominators.cpp - Machine Dominator Calculation --------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements simple dominator construction algorithms for finding
|
|
// forward dominators on machine functions.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallBitVector.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
// Always verify dominfo if expensive checking is enabled.
|
|
#ifdef EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
|
|
static bool VerifyMachineDomInfo = true;
|
|
#else
|
|
static bool VerifyMachineDomInfo = false;
|
|
#endif
|
|
static cl::opt<bool, true> VerifyMachineDomInfoX(
|
|
"verify-machine-dom-info", cl::location(VerifyMachineDomInfo),
|
|
cl::desc("Verify machine dominator info (time consuming)"));
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
template class DomTreeNodeBase<MachineBasicBlock>;
|
|
template class DominatorTreeBase<MachineBasicBlock>;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
char MachineDominatorTree::ID = 0;
|
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS(MachineDominatorTree, "machinedomtree",
|
|
"MachineDominator Tree Construction", true, true)
|
|
|
|
char &llvm::MachineDominatorsID = MachineDominatorTree::ID;
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
|
AU.setPreservesAll();
|
|
MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool MachineDominatorTree::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &F) {
|
|
CriticalEdgesToSplit.clear();
|
|
NewBBs.clear();
|
|
DT.reset(new DominatorTreeBase<MachineBasicBlock>(false));
|
|
DT->recalculate(F);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
MachineDominatorTree::MachineDominatorTree()
|
|
: MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
|
|
initializeMachineDominatorTreePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::releaseMemory() {
|
|
CriticalEdgesToSplit.clear();
|
|
DT.reset(nullptr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::verifyAnalysis() const {
|
|
if (DT && VerifyMachineDomInfo)
|
|
verifyDomTree();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module*) const {
|
|
if (DT)
|
|
DT->print(OS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::applySplitCriticalEdges() const {
|
|
// Bail out early if there is nothing to do.
|
|
if (CriticalEdgesToSplit.empty())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// For each element in CriticalEdgesToSplit, remember whether or not element
|
|
// is the new immediate domminator of its successor. The mapping is done by
|
|
// index, i.e., the information for the ith element of CriticalEdgesToSplit is
|
|
// the ith element of IsNewIDom.
|
|
SmallBitVector IsNewIDom(CriticalEdgesToSplit.size(), true);
|
|
size_t Idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
// Collect all the dominance properties info, before invalidating
|
|
// the underlying DT.
|
|
for (CriticalEdge &Edge : CriticalEdgesToSplit) {
|
|
// Update dominator information.
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *Succ = Edge.ToBB;
|
|
MachineDomTreeNode *SuccDTNode = DT->getNode(Succ);
|
|
|
|
for (MachineBasicBlock *PredBB : Succ->predecessors()) {
|
|
if (PredBB == Edge.NewBB)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// If we are in this situation:
|
|
// FromBB1 FromBB2
|
|
// + +
|
|
// + + + +
|
|
// + + + +
|
|
// ... Split1 Split2 ...
|
|
// + +
|
|
// + +
|
|
// +
|
|
// Succ
|
|
// Instead of checking the domiance property with Split2, we check it with
|
|
// FromBB2 since Split2 is still unknown of the underlying DT structure.
|
|
if (NewBBs.count(PredBB)) {
|
|
assert(PredBB->pred_size() == 1 && "A basic block resulting from a "
|
|
"critical edge split has more "
|
|
"than one predecessor!");
|
|
PredBB = *PredBB->pred_begin();
|
|
}
|
|
if (!DT->dominates(SuccDTNode, DT->getNode(PredBB))) {
|
|
IsNewIDom[Idx] = false;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
++Idx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now, update DT with the collected dominance properties info.
|
|
Idx = 0;
|
|
for (CriticalEdge &Edge : CriticalEdgesToSplit) {
|
|
// We know FromBB dominates NewBB.
|
|
MachineDomTreeNode *NewDTNode = DT->addNewBlock(Edge.NewBB, Edge.FromBB);
|
|
|
|
// If all the other predecessors of "Succ" are dominated by "Succ" itself
|
|
// then the new block is the new immediate dominator of "Succ". Otherwise,
|
|
// the new block doesn't dominate anything.
|
|
if (IsNewIDom[Idx])
|
|
DT->changeImmediateDominator(DT->getNode(Edge.ToBB), NewDTNode);
|
|
++Idx;
|
|
}
|
|
NewBBs.clear();
|
|
CriticalEdgesToSplit.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::verifyDomTree() const {
|
|
if (!DT)
|
|
return;
|
|
MachineFunction &F = *getRoot()->getParent();
|
|
|
|
DominatorTreeBase<MachineBasicBlock> OtherDT(false);
|
|
OtherDT.recalculate(F);
|
|
if (getRootNode()->getBlock() != OtherDT.getRootNode()->getBlock() ||
|
|
DT->compare(OtherDT)) {
|
|
errs() << "MachineDominatorTree is not up to date!\nComputed:\n";
|
|
DT->print(errs());
|
|
errs() << "\nActual:\n";
|
|
OtherDT.print(errs());
|
|
abort();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|