mirror of
https://github.com/RPCSX/llvm.git
synced 2024-12-01 07:30:31 +00:00
5e2e6f2855
Summary: I've taken my best guess at this, but I've cargo culted in places & so explanations/corrections would be great. This seems to pass all the tests (check-all, covering clang and llvm) so I believe that pretty well exercises both the backwards compatibility and common (same version) compatibility given the number of checked in bitcode files we already have. Is that a reasonable approach to testing here? Would some more explicit tests be desired? 1) is this the right way to do back-compat in this case (looking at the number of entries in the bitcode record to disambiguate between the old schema and the new?) 2) I don't quite understand the logarithm logic to choose the encoding type of the type parameter in the abbreviation description, but I found another instruction doing the same thing & it seems to work. Is that the right approach? Reviewers: dexonsmith Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7655 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Analysis | ||
| AsmParser | ||
| Bitcode | ||
| CodeGen | ||
| DebugInfo | ||
| ExecutionEngine | ||
| Fuzzer | ||
| IR | ||
| IRReader | ||
| LineEditor | ||
| Linker | ||
| LTO | ||
| MC | ||
| Object | ||
| Option | ||
| ProfileData | ||
| Support | ||
| TableGen | ||
| Target | ||
| Transforms | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| LLVMBuild.txt | ||
| Makefile | ||