llvm/test/Bitcode/mdnodes-in-post-order.ll
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith e33a1a53cc BitcodeWriter: Emit metadata in post-order (again)
Emit metadata nodes in post-order.  The iterative algorithm from r266709
failed to maintain this property.  After understanding my mistake, it
wasn't too hard to write a test with llvm-bcanalyzer (and I've actually
made this change once before: see r220340).

This also reverts the "noisy" testcase change from r266709.  That should
have been more of a red flag :/.

Note: The same bug crept into the ValueMapper in r265456.  I'm still
working on the fix.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-04-21 01:55:12 +00:00

35 lines
1.2 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: llvm-as <%s | llvm-bcanalyzer -dump | FileCheck %s
; Check that nodes are emitted in post-order to minimize the need for temporary
; nodes. The graph structure is designed to foil naive implementations of
; iteratitive post-order traersals: the leaves, !3 and !4, are reachable from
; the entry node, !6, as well as from !5. There is one leaf on either side to
; be sure it tickles bugs whether operands are visited forward or reverse.
; Nodes in this testcase are numbered to match how they are referenced in
; bitcode. !3 is referenced as opN=3.
; We don't care about the order of the strings (or of !3 and !4). Let's just
; make sure the strings are first and make it clear that there are two of them.
; CHECK: <STRINGS {{.*}} num-strings = 2 {
; CHECK-NEXT: 'leaf
; CHECK-NEXT: 'leaf
; CHECK-NEXT: }
; The leafs should come first (in either order).
; CHECK-NEXT: <NODE op0=1/>
; CHECK-NEXT: <NODE op0=2/>
!3 = !{!"leaf3"}
!4 = !{!"leaf4"}
; CHECK-NEXT: <NODE op0=3 op1=4/>
!5 = !{!3, !4}
; CHECK-NEXT: <NODE op0=3 op1=5 op2=4/>
!6 = !{!3, !5, !4}
; Note: named metadata nodes are not cannot reference null so their operands
; are numbered off-by-one.
; CHECK-NEXT: <NAME
; CHECK-NEXT: <NAMED_NODE op0=5/>
!named = !{!6}