Sanjoy Das 6e45bd9223 Re-apply r245635, "[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0"
The original checkin was buggy, this change has a fix.

Original commit message:

[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0

Summary:

This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:

 1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
 2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.

This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.

Reviewers: reames, majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@245753 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-08-21 22:22:37 +00:00
..
2015-08-11 21:33:55 +00:00
2015-08-21 21:09:51 +00:00

This directory contains test cases for the instcombine transformation.  The
dated tests are actual bug tests, whereas the named tests are used to test
for features that the this pass should be capable of performing.