Files
zero/internal/agent/completion_policy.go
Anandan 9242b9e037 Add transcript-grounded structured task state (#761)
* Add transcript-grounded structured task state

Project existing plan, tool-result, changed-file, verification, and completion events into a deterministic per-run snapshot.

Emit content-free aggregate snapshots to traces. Carry bounded objective context through compaction and ground completion checks only when the projection matches the transcript; mismatches retain transcript-derived behavior and drop stale carried state.

Tested: make fmt-check

Tested: go vet ./...

Tested: go test ./...

Tested: go test -race ./internal/agent ./internal/trace

Tested: go run ./cmd/zero-release build

Tested: go run ./cmd/zero-release smoke

Tested: govulncheck ./... (no vulnerabilities found)

Advisory: pinned golangci-lint reports only unrelated pre-existing findings

Tested: git diff HEAD --check

* Preserve task objective across repeated compaction

Keep the immutable run objective when plan calls have been elided, while admitting mutable task fields only when plan parity still matches the transcript.

Make plan parsing match update_plan rejection semantics, coalesce and cap task-state trace events, rename parity to its plan-only scope, use explicit nilable dependencies, and remove confirmable objective fingerprints from traces.

Tested: make fmt-check

Tested: go vet ./...

Tested: go test ./...

Tested: go test -race ./internal/agent ./internal/trace

Tested: go run ./cmd/zero-release build

Tested: go run ./cmd/zero-release smoke

Tested: govulncheck ./... (no vulnerabilities found)

Advisory: pinned golangci-lint reports only unrelated pre-existing findings

Tested: git diff HEAD --check
2026-07-19 21:38:58 +05:30

87 lines
2.9 KiB
Go

package agent
// CompletionDecision is the deterministic outcome of evaluating a text-only
// assistant turn. Uncertain means the loop needs one bounded follow-up action
// before it can finalize the run.
type CompletionDecision string
const (
CompletionUncertain CompletionDecision = "uncertain"
CompletionComplete CompletionDecision = "complete"
CompletionIncomplete CompletionDecision = "incomplete"
)
type completionAction string
const (
completionActionNone completionAction = ""
completionActionContinue completionAction = "continue"
completionActionSemanticCheck completionAction = "semantic_check"
)
type completionEvaluation struct {
Decision CompletionDecision
Action completionAction
Reason string
}
// completionPolicy owns the small amount of state needed to keep uncertain
// decisions bounded. requireSemanticCheck is set only for run profiles that
// already opted into self-correction; ordinary completion remains entirely
// local and adds no model call.
type completionPolicy struct {
continueNudges int
requireSemanticCheck bool
semanticCheckRequested bool
}
func newCompletionPolicy(requireSemanticCheck bool) *completionPolicy {
return &completionPolicy{requireSemanticCheck: requireSemanticCheck}
}
func (policy *completionPolicy) evaluate(text string, context completionContext) completionEvaluation {
// A direct admission is strong local evidence and takes precedence over all
// weaker signals, avoiding both continuation nudges and semantic checks.
if reason := selfReportedIncompletion(text); reason != "" {
return completionEvaluation{Decision: CompletionIncomplete, Reason: reason}
}
// A continuation cue is strong unfinished evidence; a pending plan is only
// weak evidence because bookkeeping can be stale. Both get a bounded chance
// to continue, but only a persisted cue is ultimately incomplete.
cue := endsWithContinuationCue(text)
if cue || context.PlanPending {
if policy.continueNudges < maxContinueNudges {
policy.continueNudges++
reason := "your message ended mid-step"
if !cue {
reason = "pending plan items remain — finish them, or mark them complete with update_plan if you are done"
}
return completionEvaluation{
Decision: CompletionUncertain,
Action: completionActionContinue,
Reason: reason,
}
}
if cue {
return completionEvaluation{
Decision: CompletionIncomplete,
Reason: "your message ended mid-step",
}
}
}
// Profiles with self-correction enabled require one task-grounded semantic
// check. It is requested at most once per run; the next locally complete turn
// is accepted without another model call.
if policy.requireSemanticCheck && !policy.semanticCheckRequested {
policy.semanticCheckRequested = true
return completionEvaluation{
Decision: CompletionUncertain,
Action: completionActionSemanticCheck,
}
}
return completionEvaluation{Decision: CompletionComplete, Action: completionActionNone}
}