Files
zero/internal/agent/completion_policy.go
Anandan 18cce358a2 Add deterministic completion policy (#719)
Extract completion decisions from the agent loop into a feature-gated typed policy with complete, incomplete, and uncertain outcomes. Preserve bounded plan-stall nudges and allow at most one semantic acceptance check for self-correcting runs.

Tested: make build

Tested: make test

Tested: go fmt ./...

Tested: go vet ./...

Tested: make lint

Tested: govulncheck ./...

Note: repository-wide pinned golangci-lint reports 36 pre-existing unrelated findings; internal/agent/... reports 0 issues.
2026-07-18 00:29:58 +05:30

87 lines
2.9 KiB
Go

package agent
// CompletionDecision is the deterministic outcome of evaluating a text-only
// assistant turn. Uncertain means the loop needs one bounded follow-up action
// before it can finalize the run.
type CompletionDecision string
const (
CompletionUncertain CompletionDecision = "uncertain"
CompletionComplete CompletionDecision = "complete"
CompletionIncomplete CompletionDecision = "incomplete"
)
type completionAction string
const (
completionActionNone completionAction = ""
completionActionContinue completionAction = "continue"
completionActionSemanticCheck completionAction = "semantic_check"
)
type completionEvaluation struct {
Decision CompletionDecision
Action completionAction
Reason string
}
// completionPolicy owns the small amount of state needed to keep uncertain
// decisions bounded. requireSemanticCheck is set only for run profiles that
// already opted into self-correction; ordinary completion remains entirely
// local and adds no model call.
type completionPolicy struct {
continueNudges int
requireSemanticCheck bool
semanticCheckRequested bool
}
func newCompletionPolicy(requireSemanticCheck bool) *completionPolicy {
return &completionPolicy{requireSemanticCheck: requireSemanticCheck}
}
func (policy *completionPolicy) evaluate(text string, planPending bool) completionEvaluation {
// A direct admission is strong local evidence and takes precedence over all
// weaker signals, avoiding both continuation nudges and semantic checks.
if reason := selfReportedIncompletion(text); reason != "" {
return completionEvaluation{Decision: CompletionIncomplete, Reason: reason}
}
// A continuation cue is strong unfinished evidence; a pending plan is only
// weak evidence because bookkeeping can be stale. Both get a bounded chance
// to continue, but only a persisted cue is ultimately incomplete.
cue := endsWithContinuationCue(text)
if cue || planPending {
if policy.continueNudges < maxContinueNudges {
policy.continueNudges++
reason := "your message ended mid-step"
if !cue {
reason = "pending plan items remain — finish them, or mark them complete with update_plan if you are done"
}
return completionEvaluation{
Decision: CompletionUncertain,
Action: completionActionContinue,
Reason: reason,
}
}
if cue {
return completionEvaluation{
Decision: CompletionIncomplete,
Reason: "your message ended mid-step",
}
}
}
// Profiles with self-correction enabled require one task-grounded semantic
// check. It is requested at most once per run; the next locally complete turn
// is accepted without another model call.
if policy.requireSemanticCheck && !policy.semanticCheckRequested {
policy.semanticCheckRequested = true
return completionEvaluation{
Decision: CompletionUncertain,
Action: completionActionSemanticCheck,
}
}
return completionEvaluation{Decision: CompletionComplete, Action: completionActionNone}
}