anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

[PR #2983] experimental batch tool #10503

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 18:15:10 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:15:10 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/2983

State: closed
Merged: Yes

Summary

This PR adds a new tool to opencode: batch

Explainer

Lately I've been trying to make parallel tool calling work reliably with different models using prompt engineering, but it has shown to be the wrong approach. By simply exposing a batch tool every model I use (gh/gpt-5, gh/sonnet-4.5, zai/glm-4.6) have seen dramatic increase in likely hood of executing parallel tool calling.
I still find myself having to say "use batch" from time to time but overall, it's been great.

Numbers

I haven't actually made legit benchmarks to test the real efficiency gain from this PR, but after using it for a minute, I can see a substantial decrease in average completion time of user requests. This PR is also likely beneficial for provider rate limiting (1 request instead of 3++ over the course of a working day do pile up...)

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/2983 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- ## Summary This PR adds a new tool to opencode: `batch` ### Explainer Lately I've been trying to make parallel tool calling work reliably with different models using prompt engineering, but it has shown to be the wrong approach. By simply exposing a `batch` tool every model I use (gh/gpt-5, gh/sonnet-4.5, zai/glm-4.6) have seen dramatic increase in likely hood of executing parallel tool calling. I still find myself having to say "use batch" from time to time but overall, it's been great. ### Numbers I haven't actually made legit benchmarks to test the real efficiency gain from this PR, but after using it for a minute, I can see a substantial decrease in average completion time of user requests. This PR is also likely beneficial for provider rate limiting (1 request instead of 3++ over the course of a working day do pile up...)
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-16 18:15:10 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 18:15:10 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#10503
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?