anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 18:25:32 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Many tool calls rejected due to missing required parameters #109

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:25:14 -05:00 by yindo · 5 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:14 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @GitMurf on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

I am using OpenAI gpt-4.1 mostly and seem to be getting a lot of failed tool calls. For example on the edit file tool it misses the offset and index parameters (off top of my head). I instruct it that it is missing those required parameters and then the rest of the session it seems to work ok.

Another common one I’ve noticed missed from a lot of different tool calls is the timeout parameter.

It seems as if maybe the schema / zod requirements have been updated recently but the prompts / tool descriptions and parameter descriptions have not been updated? Just guessing.

Is this happening for others? I doubt this is a gpt-4.1 issue because it does very well with tool calling with other agentic tools like Goose, Aider etc.

Let me know if you have any questions or need me to test anything. I am pulling / building from master (dev branch).

Originally created by @GitMurf on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. I am using OpenAI gpt-4.1 mostly and seem to be getting a lot of failed tool calls. For example on the edit file tool it misses the offset and index parameters (off top of my head). I instruct it that it is missing those required parameters and then the rest of the session it seems to work ok. Another common one I’ve noticed missed from a lot of different tool calls is the timeout parameter. It seems as if maybe the schema / zod requirements have been updated recently but the prompts / tool descriptions and parameter descriptions have not been updated? Just guessing. Is this happening for others? I doubt this is a gpt-4.1 issue because it does very well with tool calling with other agentic tools like Goose, Aider etc. Let me know if you have any questions or need me to test anything. I am pulling / building from master (dev branch).
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:25:14 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025):

i'm working through some of these issues today - quick question how come you're using 4.1 instead of codex?

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025): i'm working through some of these issues today - quick question how come you're using 4.1 instead of codex?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025):

can you see if 0.1.71 is better?

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025): can you see if 0.1.71 is better?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@GitMurf commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025):

quick question how come you're using 4.1 instead of codex?

Not familiar with the codex model. Can you link to it in OpenAI docs? Also between OpenAI and GitHub there are about 7 different things referred to as Codex 🤣 so I get confused easy.

@GitMurf commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025): > quick question how come you're using 4.1 instead of codex? Not familiar with the codex model. Can you link to it in OpenAI docs? Also between OpenAI and GitHub there are about 7 different things referred to as Codex 🤣 so I get confused easy.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@GitMurf commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025):

can you see if 0.1.71 is better?

Will test shortly and let you know.

@GitMurf commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2025): > can you see if 0.1.71 is better? Will test shortly and let you know.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@GitMurf commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2025):

can you see if 0.1.71 is better?

Ok after some testing it seems like the tool calling issues have been resolved @thdxr ... nice work, thanks!!

@GitMurf commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2025): > can you see if 0.1.71 is better? Ok after some testing it seems like the tool calling issues have been resolved @thdxr ... nice work, thanks!!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#109
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?