anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 18:25:32 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

remote code download for github copilot auth #1212

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:30:01 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:30:01 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @hhoeflin on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Hi,

thanks for providing opencode. I wanted to use it with github copilot, and it is great that opencode supports this (as opposed to e.g. crush). However looking into how this is done, i found

https://github.com/sst/opencode/blob/542186aa49e766c3acfe285c00bdfeae902be748/packages/opencode/src/auth/copilot.ts#L8

where seemingly code from

https://github.com/sst/opencode-github-copilot

is downloaded and executed. The idea that the auth-framework is downloading separate code that has not been present during install of the software sounds like a big security risk and I don´t understand why it is done in the first place (it is a single file that could be included directly into opencode).

Is my understanding of this workflow correct? Could you comment on why this is done this way?

Thanks

Originally created by @hhoeflin on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. Hi, thanks for providing opencode. I wanted to use it with github copilot, and it is great that opencode supports this (as opposed to e.g. crush). However looking into how this is done, i found https://github.com/sst/opencode/blob/542186aa49e766c3acfe285c00bdfeae902be748/packages/opencode/src/auth/copilot.ts#L8 where seemingly code from https://github.com/sst/opencode-github-copilot is downloaded and executed. The idea that the auth-framework is downloading separate code that has not been present during install of the software sounds like a big security risk and I don´t understand why it is done in the first place (it is a single file that could be included directly into opencode). Is my understanding of this workflow correct? Could you comment on why this is done this way? Thanks
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:30:01 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:30:02 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2025):

this kind of functionality should be implemented as a plugin - we didn't have plugin support initially so this was a hack

if microsoft has an issue with this integration we don't want them DMCA-ing the main repo

i'll fix this though

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2025): this kind of functionality should be implemented as a plugin - we didn't have plugin support initially so this was a hack<br><br>if microsoft has an issue with this integration we don't want them DMCA-ing the main repo<br><br>i'll fix this though
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#1212
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?