Bug: When aborting and sending a new message the agent ignores the new message and starts processing the previous user message. #1509

Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:31:18 -05:00 by yindo · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ezynda3 on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025).

https://opencode.ai/s/XUM7d2Ym for reference

Originally created by @ezynda3 on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025). https://opencode.ai/s/XUM7d2Ym for reference
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:31:18 -05:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #2171: Discusses whether interrupted messages are lost from context and similar behavior where aborted messages affect subsequent processing
  • #2246: Reports queued messages not running properly, where messages get ignored or don't process as expected

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #2171: Discusses whether interrupted messages are lost from context and similar behavior where aborted messages affect subsequent processing - #2246: Reports queued messages not running properly, where messages get ignored or don't process as expected Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
Author
Owner

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):

@ezynda3 are you referring to this?

Glob “**/zksync/*Eco*.sol”
No files found

there is none

I'll update the EcoFacet.sol to use "portal" instead of "intentSource" for naming consistency, then update the deploy scripts.
@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025): @ezynda3 are you referring to this? ``` Glob “**/zksync/*Eco*.sol” No files found ``` > there is none ``` I'll update the EcoFacet.sol to use "portal" instead of "intentSource" for naming consistency, then update the deploy scripts. ```
Author
Owner

@ezynda3 commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

Yes

@ezynda3 commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): Yes
Author
Owner

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

To me it looks just like prompting issue tbh, I will test to make sure but if the llm is in a loop and you break it will only a few words I dont know how much it will respect that instruction

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): To me it looks just like prompting issue tbh, I will test to make sure but if the llm is in a loop and you break it will only a few words I dont know how much it will respect that instruction
Author
Owner

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

Yeah just tested, @ezynda3 this is just a prompting issue, the LLM likely needs a bit more of a prompt to steer it off the loop it was already doing.

Closing since this isn't on our end

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): Yeah just tested, @ezynda3 this is just a prompting issue, the LLM likely needs a bit more of a prompt to steer it off the loop it was already doing. Closing since this isn't on our end
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#1509