anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 18:25:32 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Simple zero-retention model boolean feature flag #1865

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:33:00 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:00 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @ari-becker on GitHub (Sep 28, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @fwang on GitHub.

Per https://opencode.ai/docs/zen#privacy , in general I understand that OpenCode Zen doesn't use providers that that will retain code/data sent for inference, but the privacy policy does list exceptions.

Could there be some kind of simple boolean feature flag that forbids OpenCode Zen from using a provider that will retain code/data, even if it results in slightly higher prices or suboptimal results?

Originally created by @ari-becker on GitHub (Sep 28, 2025). Originally assigned to: @fwang on GitHub. Per https://opencode.ai/docs/zen#privacy , in general I understand that OpenCode Zen doesn't use providers that that will retain code/data sent for inference, but the privacy policy does list exceptions. Could there be some kind of simple boolean feature flag that forbids OpenCode Zen from using a provider that will retain code/data, even if it results in slightly higher prices or suboptimal results?
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:33:00 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2025):

Yes there have been talks internally about this, makes total sense

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2025): Yes there have been talks internally about this, makes total sense
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@R44VC0RP commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2026):

Closing as duplicate of #10416 which covers the same concern about privacy/retention defaults.

Workaround in the meantime:

{
  "disabled_providers": ["opencode"]
}

Or explicitly set your small model:

{
  "small_model": "your-provider/your-model"
}

Thanks for the feature request - tracking in #10416!

@R44VC0RP commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2026): Closing as duplicate of #10416 which covers the same concern about privacy/retention defaults. **Workaround in the meantime:** ```json { "disabled_providers": ["opencode"] } ``` Or explicitly set your small model: ```json { "small_model": "your-provider/your-model" } ``` Thanks for the feature request - tracking in #10416!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#1865
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?