anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 18:25:32 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

[Feature] : Add Nebius Token Factory Models Support #1925

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:33:15 -05:00 by yindo · 10 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:15 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @Arindam200 on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub.

It currently supports multiple LLM providers out of the box. It would be great to add Nebius AI Studio as an additional provider.

Nebius AI Studio offers:

  • High-performance LLMs with low-latency streaming
  • Tool calling support
  • Competitive pricing and scalability
  • Compatibility with OpenAI-compatible APIs (making integration straightforward)

This would give developers more flexibility and allow them to try Nebius models alongside other providers already supported.

Originally created by @Arindam200 on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025). Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub. It currently supports multiple LLM providers out of the box. It would be great to add [Nebius AI Studio](https://dub.sh/nebius) as an additional provider. Nebius AI Studio offers: - High-performance LLMs with low-latency streaming - Tool calling support - Competitive pricing and scalability - Compatibility with OpenAI-compatible APIs (making integration straightforward) This would give developers more flexibility and allow them to try Nebius models alongside other providers already supported.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:33:15 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #2784: Request to add agentrouter.org provider support - similar provider addition request
  • #2901: Request for OpenAI-compatible /v1/models endpoint - mentions OpenAI-compatible APIs integration
  • #2781: Request to add Gemini model support - similar model/provider addition request
  • #2746: AWS Bedrock custom inference profiles support - another provider enhancement request

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #2784: Request to add agentrouter.org provider support - similar provider addition request - #2901: Request for OpenAI-compatible /v1/models endpoint - mentions OpenAI-compatible APIs integration - #2781: Request to add Gemini model support - similar model/provider addition request - #2746: AWS Bedrock custom inference profiles support - another provider enhancement request Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

If this is something you'd like to contribute it'd be welcome, just so you know we have a model list:
https://github.com/sst/models.dev

And adding Nebius models there would be first step

Once that is done it would be pretty easy to document how to use it in our docs.

Ofc you should be able to use Nebius right now see how to make a custom provider:
https://opencode.ai/docs/providers/#custom-provider

If more people ask for this it will be prioritized but right now we have a few bigger ticket items to take care of so just forewarning

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): If this is something you'd like to contribute it'd be welcome, just so you know we have a model list: https://github.com/sst/models.dev And adding Nebius models there would be first step Once that is done it would be pretty easy to document how to use it in our docs. Ofc you should be able to use Nebius right now see how to make a custom provider: https://opencode.ai/docs/providers/#custom-provider If more people ask for this it will be prioritized but right now we have a few bigger ticket items to take care of so just forewarning
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

Hey @rekram1-node ,

I can work on this. So, First I will add nebius to models.dev after that we can move forward

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): Hey @rekram1-node , I can work on this. So, First I will add nebius to models.dev after that we can move forward
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

Sounds good!

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): Sounds good!
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@shivaycb commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2025):

Thanks @Arindam200

@shivaycb commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2025): Thanks @Arindam200
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

Hey @rekram1-node ,

I've made the PR on Models.dev

https://github.com/sst/models.dev/pull/271

Should I wait for it to get merged or can i make the PR for the Docs update here?

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): Hey @rekram1-node , I've made the PR on Models.dev https://github.com/sst/models.dev/pull/271 Should I wait for it to get merged or can i make the PR for the Docs update here?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

you can go ahead and make PR here too just link to models.dev one and leave a note saying that the models.dev pr should be merged first

I can't approve models.dev prs but other people could

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): you can go ahead and make PR here too just link to models.dev one and leave a note saying that the models.dev pr should be merged first I can't approve models.dev prs but other people could
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

Thanks, I've created the PR

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): Thanks, I've created the PR
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2025):

Hey @rekram1-node

models.dev PR has been merged. Can you please merge this PR?

@Arindam200 commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2025): Hey @rekram1-node models.dev PR has been merged. Can you please merge this PR?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:16 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2025):

@Arindam200 left a comment

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2025): @Arindam200 left a comment
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#1925
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?