anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

write tool sometimes has a "request was aborted" result #193

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00 by yindo · 14 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @adamdotdevin on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

i think this is when maxTokens is exceeded, should return a better error for this case

Originally created by @adamdotdevin on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. i think this is when maxTokens is exceeded, should return a better error for this case
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jackberger03 commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025):

having this issue a lot as well using claude 4 opus on the max plan, usually on the second or third file write

@jackberger03 commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025): having this issue a lot as well using claude 4 opus on the max plan, usually on the second or third file write
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@oscabriel commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025):

I'm encountering this pretty often using the context7 mcp when trying to write detailed plan files. Claude Code doesn't have any issue with it. Can you set maxTokens in the config? Better error messaging here would be great to at least know what's causing the request to be aborted.

@oscabriel commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025): I'm encountering this pretty often using the context7 mcp when trying to write detailed plan files. Claude Code doesn't have any issue with it. Can you set maxTokens in the config? Better error messaging here would be great to at least know what's causing the request to be aborted.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@cloudbridgeuy commented on GitHub (Jun 23, 2025):

I'm also seeing this fairly often. I have to ask it to continue or resume to get it back to work. If there's a way to obtain debugging information about the issue, I would gladly append it here.

For reference, I was using Sonnet 4 and had a context window of 60% the last time this happened.

I run /compact after a second time hitting that message, dropping the context to 10%, but couldn't make it work.

@cloudbridgeuy commented on GitHub (Jun 23, 2025): I'm also seeing this fairly often. I have to ask it to `continue` or `resume` to get it back to work. If there's a way to obtain debugging information about the issue, I would gladly append it here. For reference, I was using `Sonnet 4` and had a context window of `60%` the last time this happened. I run `/compact` after a second time hitting that message, dropping the context to `10%`, but couldn't make it work.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jeremytregunna commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2025):

Even after trying all these things, I can reliably make this happen analyzing the code of opencode from the repo with the prompt talking about reverse engineering it. start with a high level overview of the different components, then after that's done and written to a file, use the same sort of prompt framework reminding it's doing a reverse engineer task, it's working on a specific section from the high level doc, and to be as detailed as possible, talking about integration points, including internal/external, provide a deep understanding of what the code is doing and how it fits into the greater system.

That approach will get you the high level, and maybe 1 or 2 subsystem detailed responses, then it reliably starts to fail. Restart it, you get 1 more, and then it reliably fails, ad infinitum.

Tried a bunch of things to give a way to test this reliably, and this is the best I've found, using claude 4 sonnet at least.

@jeremytregunna commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2025): Even after trying all these things, I can reliably make this happen analyzing the code of opencode from the repo with the prompt talking about reverse engineering it. start with a high level overview of the different components, then after that's done and written to a file, use the same sort of prompt framework reminding it's doing a reverse engineer task, it's working on a specific section from the high level doc, and to be as detailed as possible, talking about integration points, including internal/external, provide a deep understanding of what the code is doing and how it fits into the greater system. That approach will get you the high level, and maybe 1 or 2 subsystem detailed responses, then it reliably starts to fail. Restart it, you get 1 more, and then it reliably fails, ad infinitum. Tried a bunch of things to give a way to test this reliably, and this is the best I've found, using claude 4 sonnet at least.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025):

can you try to reproduce this one more time with latest?

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025): can you try to reproduce this one more time with latest?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jedisct1 commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025):

Still happens for me with the latest.

Using Claude models.

@jedisct1 commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025): Still happens for me with the latest. Using Claude models.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@albisserAdrian commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025):

Started happening to me today using Claude Pro or API key after updating from v0.1.120 to the latest version, I just get request was aborted after Preparing edit.... No issues when using claude-code with a Pro account.

@albisserAdrian commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025): Started happening to me today using Claude Pro or API key after updating from v0.1.120 to the latest version, I just get `request was aborted` after `Preparing edit...`. No issues when using claude-code with a Pro account.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@oscabriel commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025):

Yep, the problem had stopped for me and just came back when I updated to latest (v0.1.146). Asked it to read some docs, check some files in my codebase, and make a plan, and got the request was aborted during the actual writing the plan step of the todo list it created.

@oscabriel commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025): Yep, the problem had stopped for me and just came back when I updated to latest (v0.1.146). Asked it to read some docs, check some files in my codebase, and make a plan, and got the `request was aborted` during the actual writing the plan step of the todo list it created.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jeremytregunna commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025):

can you try to reproduce this one more time with latest?

@thdxr Still able to reproduce it using my directions above.

@jeremytregunna commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025): > can you try to reproduce this one more time with latest? @thdxr Still able to reproduce it using my directions above.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@adamdotdevin commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025):

i've asked dax to hop on this one, it's driving me crazy

@adamdotdevin commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025): i've asked dax to hop on this one, it's driving me crazy
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:42 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@albisserAdrian commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025):

@adamdotdevin after updating from v0.1.146 to v0.1.150 the issue was resolved for me both on mac and WSL.

@albisserAdrian commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025): @adamdotdevin after updating from v0.1.146 to v0.1.150 the issue was resolved for me both on mac and WSL.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:43 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@cloudbridgeuy commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025):

I'll update and give it a try to see if I can resolve the issue, then report back.

Edit:

I worked on a feature using version 0.1.145 until I hit the request was aborted error. I then upgraded to version 0.1.152 and, after telling the agent to continue where it left off, it didn't fail.

@cloudbridgeuy commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2025): I'll update and give it a try to see if I can resolve the issue, then report back. _Edit:_ I worked on a feature using version `0.1.145` until I hit the `request was aborted` error. I then upgraded to version `0.1.152` and, after telling the agent to continue where it left off, it didn't fail.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:43 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@mabadir commented on GitHub (Jun 30, 2025):

I stopped seeing this error, just reporting. But I also did not have a way to reproduce it.

@mabadir commented on GitHub (Jun 30, 2025): I stopped seeing this error, just reporting. But I also did not have a way to reproduce it.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:25:43 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@adamdotdevin commented on GitHub (Jul 4, 2025):

going to close this as resolved, lots of fixes since this was opened.

@adamdotdevin commented on GitHub (Jul 4, 2025): going to close this as resolved, lots of fixes since this was opened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#193
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?