anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Test: Verify context capture in second report #1972

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @paulbettner on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025).

Issue

Testing whether the reporting system correctly captures previous conversation context on subsequent reports.

cc @paulbettner

Session Context

Recent conversation:

  • User tested /report command with "just testing the reporting system"
  • Created issue #2993 successfully
  • User now testing if second report captures that previous interaction

Current work:

  • Branch: reporting
  • Time: 2025-10-06
  • Latest commit: df077dc83 fix: make lane description optional and add confidence command

Purpose: Verify that subsequent reports in same session include context from earlier in the conversation.

Environment Details
  • Branch: reporting
  • Latest commit: df077dc83
  • Previous issue created: #2993
Originally created by @paulbettner on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025). ## Issue Testing whether the reporting system correctly captures previous conversation context on subsequent reports. cc @paulbettner ## Session Context **Recent conversation:** - User tested `/report` command with "just testing the reporting system" - Created issue #2993 successfully - User now testing if second report captures that previous interaction **Current work:** - Branch: `reporting` - Time: 2025-10-06 - Latest commit: df077dc83 fix: make lane description optional and add confidence command **Purpose:** Verify that subsequent reports in same session include context from earlier in the conversation. <details> <summary>Environment Details</summary> - Branch: reporting - Latest commit: df077dc83 - Previous issue created: #2993 </details>
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #2993: Both issues are testing the same reporting system functionality by the same user, with #2994 being a direct follow-up test to verify context capture in subsequent reports after #2993 tested the basic reporting functionality

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #2993: Both issues are testing the same reporting system functionality by the same user, with #2994 being a direct follow-up test to verify context capture in subsequent reports after #2993 tested the basic reporting functionality Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

please stop opening issues like this

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): please stop opening issues like this
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@paulbettner commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

Ugh I’m so sorry, I am horrified to see that my agent has been doing this
UPSTREAM of my fork.

I will find and turn this off immediately. Apologies!!!

On Oct 6, 2025 at 9:24:15 AM, Aiden Cline @.***> wrote:

rekram1-node left a comment (sst/opencode#2994)
https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/2994#issuecomment-3371953117

please stop opening issues like this

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/2994#issuecomment-3371953117, or
unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABRLNQXE5UI43V4BSRODND3WJ3Q7AVCNFSM6AAAAACINEFDK6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTGNZRHE2TGMJRG4
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

@paulbettner commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): Ugh I’m so sorry, I am horrified to see that my agent has been doing this UPSTREAM of my fork. I will find and turn this off immediately. Apologies!!! On Oct 6, 2025 at 9:24:15 AM, Aiden Cline ***@***.***> wrote: > *rekram1-node* left a comment (sst/opencode#2994) > <https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/2994#issuecomment-3371953117> > > please stop opening issues like this > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/2994#issuecomment-3371953117>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABRLNQXE5UI43V4BSRODND3WJ3Q7AVCNFSM6AAAAACINEFDK6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTGNZRHE2TGMJRG4> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:33:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

no problem

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): no problem
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#1972
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?